Why the media are out of touch with reality

No science used by the elites, just consensus of academics.

by Don Hank

The report at the NPR web site tending to exonerate Palin for her gaffe about Paul Revere is typical of how arguments are presented in the media these days. You will note that there is not a shred of new data here, just a prof’s opinion. (It should be clear that NPR is only throwing a sop to conservatives here as a way of staving off the effort to defund them).

Americans have stopped asking for facts and are accepting opinions of the “educated.”

We are no more educated now than we were in 1256, when Roger Bacon enumerated, in Opus Majus, the 4 causes of error:

authority, custom, the opinion of the unskilled many, and the concealment of ignorance by a pretense of knowledge.

In the case of the mainstream media (and also in most of the careers we insist on calling “professions”), it is obvious that all of these factors are involved in our grievous mis-education and the web of unsubstantiated myths we call the truth.

Roger Bacon then outlined, in later parts of this series, an almost perfect representation of what we today call the scientific method.

However, nota bene: this method, while still generally used in the hard sciences, is all but totally ignored by academicians in other disciplines, such as psychology, journalism, economics, etc, whose practitioners nonetheless pretend to rely on science. If in fact they did so, they would use some form of the scientific method as outlined by Bacon and as refined by later philosophers in arriving at conclusions and decisions.

In fact they only rely on a consensus of academics, whom they trust implicitly for some reason that they would be hard put to articulate.

Indeed, if you ask one of these practitioners by what cognitive mechanism they arrive at their conclusions and make their decisions, they will be at a loss for words, other than to quote some “authority.”

It’s like:

[such and such an academician] said it, I believe it and that settles it.

Yet, they fail to recognize that they are in fact adherents of a religious cult. They really don’t understand the tiny world that has been presented to them by their fellows as the universe, they can’t articulate what they believe, and they are therefore increasingly isolated from everyone as they grow older.

This is why old professionals often die lonely and miserable, not knowing to what it is they have dedicated a life of service, or whether it was in fact service at all or just effort expended on behalf of an unseen soulless ruling class.

Leave a Reply

6 Comments on "Why the media are out of touch with reality"

Notify of

“He who knows not and knows not that he knows not is a fool. Shun him.
He who knows not and knows that he knows not is a ignorant. Teach him.
He who knows and knows not that he knows is asleep. Wake him. He who knows and knows that he knows is wise. Follow him.”
It is easy to see which of the “knowers” listed above Don is referring to. Good piece Don.

albert w loescher

Christ was right, Columbus was right, Semmelweisz was right, {pasteur was right, Tesla was right, Burzynski is right, Christ is yet right. The left does not know the logic of Pythagoras. The left is wrong and deluded. It cannot discern between right and wrong. Ergo, as rats, they are enchanted and follow the melodious piper of nonsense. If they believe in ‘postmortem repentance’, they are deadly wrong.

Constantine Ivanov

“Why the media are out of touch with reality?”
The answer is clear like sky:
there is no media in America anymore in the true sense.
There is a well-paid gang of political agitators who don’t give a damn about the EXISTING reality, because they want to build THEIR own reality.


[…] Why the media are out of touch with reality […]


[…] The Myths“ Demise of the scientific method: “Never the twain shall meet“ “Why the media are out of touch with reality“ Print Friendly Blog this! Bookmark on Delicious Digg this post Recommend on Facebook Share […]


[…] the report with enthusiasm and an uncanny display of uncritical thought. As I have shown here and here, the scientific method (that is, actually looking at data objectively for the sole purpose of […]