Just as you thought the DOJ couldn’t get more anti-American

Obama is probably the only White House resident we have ever had who has not made a gesture toward the grassroots in a major election cycle. His Department of Justice is reeling with a major direct hit from insider testimonies giving solid evidence that there is a racist policy in place whereby minority members indicted for crimes are getting off the hook just because of an accident of birth.

Well, even as Democrats in the Senate and Congress are starting to treat Obama like a leper and politely declining his endorsement for re-election, what does he do but turn around and stick his thumb in America’s eye by turning  a known Islamic terrorist back onto our streets (see article below).

What do you suppose would make someone behave like that who has so much to lose? I mean, all Americans who have ever contacted the White House for any reason are now receiving emails from people like Michelle Obama, for example, begging for money (she wants $3 from each of us) because, as she confesses, the White House understands the Democrats are in hot water.

Yet, the man who many call president keeps shirking his Constitutional duty.

My theory? I am sticking by Rush on this. I think Obama is a moron. But more than that, he is a vindictive moron. In spite of the tepid turnout of the One Nation rally last week, which any reasonable man would have taken as a wakeup call, he is convinced that Joe Sixpack loves him and will cheer him on as he makes America less safe.

Because down inside, we ALL hate our country as much as he does and we all realize that religion-clinging and gun-clinging hicks like us deserve to be car-bombed.

Good luck with that, Barack.

Footnote: I know that someone will remind me that Rush was saying Obama was only a moron economically. True enough. But he must also be a moron politically to behave so recklessly around election time. Does he think we are… Morons? Yes, I guess he does. But in addition, he is a Constitutional moron. Our Constitution does not give any official of the judiciary or other branch the right to drop the charges because someone belongs to a downtrodden or unpopular group. So how many morons is that now? Economic moron, Constitutional moron, and political moron. Please note I did not say he was a moron in all areas. I would never think of saying that.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/oct/doj-drops-charges-against-indicted-islamic-terrorist

DOJ Drops Charges Against Indicted Islamic Terrorist

By Judicial Watch Blog    Created 1 Oct 2010 – 11:05am

 In a stunning reversal, the Obama Justice Department has asked a judge to drop charges against a suspected Middle Eastern terrorist considered so dangerous by the government that prosecutors fought to deny him bail [1] after his indictment last year.

Suddenly, this week, the feds want the case dismissed against the Afghan-born man (Ahmadullah Sais Niazi) who authorities say planned to blow up buildings and refers to Osama fin Laden as “an angel.” Niazi, who lives in southern California, is also the brother-in-law of Osama bin Laden’s body guard.

Last year he was charged with lying about his ties to terrorists in a bid to fraudulently obtain a United States passport. The FBI had been watching Niazi for years and a federal grand jury returned a five-count indictment [2] last February. Niazi hid associations with “Specially Designated Global Terrorists,” groups including Al Qaeda, Hizb-i-Islami and the Taliban when he completed nationalization papers, according to the indictment. During one visit to Pakistan Niazi visited Dr. Amin al-Haq, the security coordinator for Osama bin Laden.

Charges against Niazi include perjury, naturalization fraud, misuse of a passport obtained by fraud and making a false statement to a federal agency. He faces a maximum sentence of 35 years in federal prison and a $1.25-million fine. His trial, which has been postponed several times, is scheduled for November if the judge doesn’t grant the government’s request.

In its motion to dismiss the indictment against Niazi, the Justice Department claims that a key overseas witness was suddenly unavailable to testify. Additionally, “evidentiary issues” [3] have also arisen since the grand jury returned the indictment, the federal motion says. So, the government is seeking to dismiss the indictment in the “interest of justice.”

Prosecutors have refused to further explain the mysterious about face, but the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a national organization that serves as the U.S. front for the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, has taken much of the credit. In a statement [4] praising the government’s motion, CAIR points out that its request to investigate the “FBI’s coercive and unlawful tactics” in Niazi’s case ultimately led the Justice Department to drop all charges.

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "Just as you thought the DOJ couldn’t get more anti-American"

Notify of
avatar
albert w loescher
Guest
This brief essay was rejected by the WT, but it was published in WesternFrontAmerica.com shortly later. If Oslumber bin Liar cannot move Gitmo to CONUS, the entity will coerce his minions to do exactly that: The editorial for page 2 in The Washington Times, 24 May 09: A Conversion of Convenience I cannot erase my memories of the Lucasville prison riot 16 years ago–the carnage of twisted bodies in the yard, obsequious officials granting outrageous demands from a dark ‘cleric’ wrapped in flowing white Arabic attire, and my righteous indignation and disgust for the ignorance of those in charge caught… Read more »
Constantine Ivanov
Guest

Happily or unfortunately, I lost my naivete virginity too long time ago, so I was not and am not deluded into a false hope with regard to DOJ ability of being State traitors. -:)
I even predict more further outrages committed by the Marxist-in-Chief with his camarilla.

wpDiscuz