Did Paul mean “homosexual” or “man ogler”?
by Don Hank
This will be of particular interest to theologians and linguists but it is in fact a debunking of a biblical misinterpretation that is relevant to all of us.
The “gay” agenda has been trying hard to make the Apostle Paul unsay what, according to most translations, he said about homosexuality. One Greek “scholar” has written that the word he used in Corinthians did not mean homosexual at all.
The verse in question is I Cor. 6:9 and the disputed term is arsenokoitai (plural of aresnokoitis). There is no dispute over the rest of the verse.
I found aresnokoitis in my Ancient Greek dictionary “The Classic Greek Dictionary” (Follet, 1948) and the puritanical definition given there is “one guilty of unnatural offenses.” This is homosexual in Prudish and is based on the fact that arseno- meant male (still does in modern GR) and koitos meant “lying (eg, in bed).” The context in Paul’s letter and his remarks on homosexuality elsewhere are clear evidence that he did really mean homosexual.
The translations of Paul’s word here is usually “Sodomite” or “homosexual” in today’s Bibles but “gay” lobbyists are keen on changing that translation and have even sued at least one Bible publisher for using it.
The “gay” lobby has been tampering with this interpretation for so many years that even modern native Greek people often believe (thanks, I surmise, to their international effort to revise the scriptures) that, although the word has survived today and means “homosexual,” it originally supposedly meant “a man who looks at other men” and some are saying that this was once illegal so Paul was just condemning the practice of men looking at other men — man oglers, one might say.
However, there are several reports in the NT of Jesus having looked at men, such as Simon Peter. So that holds no water.
They are basing this mostly on the fact that the stem of the -koitos part is from the verb koitazo, which in Modern Greek means “to look.”
The problem is that, while koitazo means “to look” in modern Greek, in Ancient Greek, koitazo meant “to lie (eg, in bed)” or “to lie down,” as you Bible scholars may know, so this explanation is nonsense.
Even if arsenokoitis did not mean homosexual, there are other passages, such as in Romans 1, that clearly show the early Christians condemned the practice.
Nonetheless, there are many places in the Western world where it is now considered illegal for pastors to preach from those parts of the Bible that condemn homosexual behavior, and this misinterpretation of arsenokoitis is one of the reasons for that ban.



May 7th, 2010 at 11:33 pm
It is totally clear in the KVJ that anything other than man & woman
sex is going to hell
May 8th, 2010 at 2:35 am
From A. T. Robertson, one of the leading authorities in Biblical NT Gk. His famous Word Pictures in the New Testament:
1Co 6:9
The unrighteous (adikoi). To remind them of the verb adikeo? just used.
The Kingdom of God (theou basileian). Precisely, God’s kingdom.
Be not deceived (me? plana?sthe). Present passive imperative with negative me?. Do not be led astray by plausible talk to cover up sin as mere animal behaviourism. Paul has two lists in 1Co_6:9, 1Co_6:10, one with repetition of oute, neither (fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, effeminate, or malakoi, abusers of themselves with men or arsenokoitai or sodomites as in 1Ti_1:10 a late word for this horrid vice, thieves, covetous), the other with ou not (drunkards, revilers, extortioners). All these will fall short of the kingdom of God. This was plain talk to a city like Corinth. It is needed today. It is a solemn roll call of the damned even if some of their names are on the church roll in Corinth whether officers or ordinary members.
Doctor Bruce Metzger, the world-renowned authority on ancient Greek and late head of Princeton Theological Seminary wrote on thsi subject as a member of a committee witht the United Presbyterian Church that debated Gay ordination some years ago. He too through solid exegesis clearly showed how wrong this was!
May 16th, 2011 at 6:19 pm
[...] http://laiglesforum.com/did-paul-mean-homosxual-or-man-ogler/1292.htm [...]