Hispanics the biggest losers in US immigration policy


by Don Hank  July 13, 2015

One of the readers in my political list serve sent me a link to a story on how the RNC “congratulated” Donald Trump after his press conference with parents of victims of illegal alien killers. It was a back handed congratulation. In each case, the messages from GOP brass like John Boehner and Jeb Bush to Trump ended with the admonition to tone down the rhetoric. In fact, the thinly veiled message was: stop telling the truth and stick to the GOP talking points.

Trump likes the word “stupid.” For example, he called US trade negotiators stupid for giving other countries economic advantages that disadvantage Americans at a time of crisis when we can ill afford to be so generous. (I had met a high ranking Taiwanese government trade negotiator in Taiwan in the 80s and learned from him how utterly stupid American negotiators were then. Nothing has changed)

The RNC and its minions in the media are also utterly stupid when it comes to immigration. They ignore the fact that Hispanics are the one group that is most afraid of illegal aliens. This is because they live in the same neighborhoods with these violent Hispanic gangs and criminals and fear the violence, and if politicians were even moderately smart, they could capitalize on this fear to educate the public about this violence and advocate for the victims, most of them immigrants themselves, instead of trying to score political points with the uneducated. But they aren’t even moderately smart.

While living in York Country, PA, my wife (Hispanic) and I were close friends with a couple from the Dominican Republic. Like most Hispanics, they were reflexively in favor of illegal immigration and the husband worked with a group that helped illegals stay in America. He was confident that he was doing good. No one had ever suggested the contrary to him. On one occasion when we were discussing illegal immigration, I asked him what he thought of Haitians who entered his country illegally. He hemmed and hawed and said that there were not that many but that some of them were able to get jobs in his country. He wouldn’t admit that Dominicans resent illegal Haitian immigrants, but I told him I knew they did and told him that Americans also resent people entering our country illegally and receiving benefits, eg, health care, that we pay for, refusing to assimilate or identify as Americans first, creating enclaves with alien value systems, bringing in crime and disease with them, etc. He was nonplussed because we had always spoken Spanish with each other and I doubt he had ever heard anyone express opposition to illegal immigration in his own language. Normally, neither Hispanics nor their non-Hispanic friends would ever dare to express that non-PC opinion.

He couldn’t respond. After all, it was my country’s laws we were talking about and I was simply telling him I wanted others to honor them, just as Dominicans want the Haitians to honor their laws. What could he say?

One day the couple and their children moved out of our area to Falls Church, VA, and we didn’t hear from them for a long time. Then one day the Señora called to speak to my wife, who was not home.

I asked her how they liked their new neighborhood and she very quietly said she was afraid for their kids (very young). She said there were dangerous gangs in that neighborhood. I knew exactly what she was talking about and immediately rose to the opportunity to ask what ethnicity these gangs were.

“Hispanic,” she whispered, no doubt afraid someone might hear her. I suspect she was more afraid of what her liberal neighbors would say than what the gangs might do. (Americans live in a terror regime without realizing it).

Ironically, while the RNC dodges the most vital issue of all in the immigration debate, namely, violent crime and violent gangs, it is the Hispanic community that has the most to lose and is frightened of and dismayed at the consequences of our misguided political policies. But because of the sinister silent mandate not to talk about this, neither Hispanics nor other Americans dare to initiate a debate that could eventually lead to a solution.
Thus, ironically, and tragically, both the GOP and the Democrats are pursuing policies of political correctness that gravely harm the constituents they pander to and that, if discussed openly, could lead Hispanics to admit that they are afraid of some of their neighbors and would welcome a solution to the violence problem. But the politicians and their PR group, arrogating to themselves the title of “journalists,” are blocking the discussion that could lead to the solution.

However, the outspoken and savvy Donald Trump has blown the door off the iron cage they have built around the truth.

I do not endorse candidates, but despite whatever faults the Donald might have, he has done America an enormous service in changing the debate.


PS: My commentaries are usually inspired by daily news tips received from correspondents subscribed to my daily news list. If you are interested in joining to receive and/or send us such tips and to read my and other readers’ commentaries on the day’s news, send your request to zoilandon@msn.com


China an unreliable tool of the New World Order

by Don Hank  July 9, 2015

It is helpful to look back at the way Americans thought not long ago and see how old analyses of events and old plots by the billionaires who think they own our planet come into focus in light of today’s events.

This kind of comparison shows how far these manipulators have come in implementing their schemes, but also something else that most of us miss, and that is: it is now safe to say that they have failed.

A commentary from 2010 titled “Maurice Strong, Father of America’s Destruction,” is making the rounds on the internet again, forwarded by Americans fearful of the New World Order’s sinister plans. Many think the plot is a fait accompli by now. Maurice was the father of Agenda 21, a UN initiative intended to reduce world population through stealthy measures that no one was supposed to notice even after they had been bruited about everywhere.

The article contains information on the elites behind the scenes engaged in the destruction of Western culture.

I wanted to focus on something that the article misses. It’s about this now obsolete observation:


“Strong has been saying all along that China would someday soon replace the U.S. as world economic leader.”


It was clear to me in the 70s when Nixon and Kissinger were pushing for free trade with China that the elites wanted China to take over the world economy but that these two schemers, and whoever was behind them, thought the US deep state could control China by careful manipulation via the government of the US, the most militarily and economically powerful country at the time. One reason for this was a desperate desire to rid the world of the Russian sphere of influence – then the Soviet Union and satellites – a desire that persists today in Neoconservative circles.

It was clear that the Western elites mentioned in this article, as well as others like Henry Kissinger, were convinced that China could be bought off and turned against Russia. They almost certainly expected that they could use money to make China a lapdog of the US.

But they forgot – or rather deliberately ignored – an important detail:


The supranationals despise culture. To them it is like nationalism and patriotism, something that must be abolished to prevent war and bring about everlasting peace under the leadership of the world’s richest men, who foolishly imagine themselves to be wise (Romans 1:22).

To better understand this, read the following excerpt from an interview with economist Michael Hudson:


“When [Neocon] Feith interviewed an experienced Pentagon Arabist, Patrick Lang, for a job in Iraq after the invasion, Feith asked: “Is it really true that you really know the Arabs this well, and that you speak Arabic this well? Is that really true?” Lang said, yes it was. “That’s too bad” said Feith.”


Lang was not hired and Hudson attributes this to a supposed anti-Arabic sentiment among the Neocons. That is a total misreading because it was none other than Neocon GW Bush who excused Islam as the religion of peace. Not only that, Bush was personal friends with the Saudi king. No, the State Department was never anti-Arab (though it is anti-Shia and opposed to secular leaders in the Arab world, based on its petrodollar agreement with the Saudis whereby the US government and military became Sunni-Saudi vassals). However, it was in fact anti-culture. The “experts” the State Department hires to analyze different regions of the world are supposed to be well versed in Neocon policies and the economic and political realities, but with minimal knowledge of the cultures of the respective regions.

One of the best examples of this anticulture mentality was Ludwig Zamenhof, a Polish supranationalist who invented his own language, Esperanto, in an attempt to avoid cultural clashes. In effect it was intended to be a step toward eliminating culture altogether, since Zamenhof, like all supranational thinkers, posited that culture is a wholly negative construct that divides humanity into mutually antagonistic groups. (Sort of like saying arteries must be eliminated from the body because they can become clogged with cholesterol).

Now, over 30 years after the start of this experiment with China, the supranationals have finally caught a glimpse of how abjectly wrong they all were.

Recently, it suddenly became abundantly clear that China was not really for sale after all, although it never revealed that fact until it was strong enough to shrug off US manipulation without resistance.

The Washington supranational elites were men who operated in secret and stealth to control the world economy and geopolitics. But being arrogant and unshakably convinced of their own infallibility, they became careless and ignored, as the years went by, the ominous signs all around them that China was not in fact becoming imbued with their ideals at all and was not shifting its deeply held allegiances, for example, to Russia.


Again, the answer is culture. An intractable and key component of Chinese culture that will not die – having even survived Mao’s onslaught – is Confucianism. On one level, the Chinese saw the US as benefactors and hence, according to Confucian code, worthy of a certain outward show of respect, but not of sincere obedience or worship. Like the Russians, they never felt a natural organic bond with Washington’s elites, only a deep seated mistrust that deepened with increasing contact. To know them was to despise them.

Therefore, unlike the Western actors in the New World Order who harbor an irresistible desire to tout their exploits or discuss amongst themselves the ways and means of achieving their ends, Chinese leaders cannot even bring themselves to enunciate their intentions, even if they wished to. Thus they could not say aloud that they would never obey these sneaky Western task masters, for whom they could have no inward respect because they sensed that these manipulators, thinking themselves cunning, were in fact their inferiors. Because, for one thing, unlike the manipulators, the Chinese, like their Russian soul brothers, do not have a price. Though both the Russians and Chinese want money, they are not driven by money. This is a subtlety the supranationals can’t grasp because such alien characteristics as integrity or spiritual bonding are absent from their mental code, which catalogues human traits like these as weaknesses. Being good Confucians, however, the Chinese leaders would show Washington respect in public and never hint that they had the economic and military advantage. This is illustrated by the interview with Chinese monetary expert Chen Yulu, who while touting the benefits of the RMB (Chinese yuan) as a world-trade currency, and reporting that RMB clearing centers were springing up like mushrooms in Europe, insisted that the RMB did not aim to challenge the dollar.

Even the Chinese people would remain unaware that their leaders secretly intended to break with Washington and go their own way as soon as they had their Peking ducks in a row. Nor was there even a need for the leaders to discuss this amongst themselves. Asians need not exchange words to come to an understanding. Their organic cultural code determines how they will behave in a group, the kinds of decisions they will make, their responses to stimuli from Western partners. Nothing need be discussed. But their responses were firmly embedded in their mental code, in their very DNA as it were, from the outset.

Much of their modus operandi is based on something akin to instinct. It’s like that mysterious something that causes a flock of starlings to suddenly veer off to the right or left without any signal in sight. They just know when and how to turn.

When and how was seen just recently, 43 years after Nixon’s historic visit to China, when an impressive contingent of Chinese troops marched in a military parade in Red Square on Victory Day (May 9, 2015) in a breath taking show of solidarity, followed by joint Russian-Chinese naval drills in the Mediterranean from May 17-21.

Contrast this with the indiscreet rhetoric of NATO and US officials constantly chattering about how outrageous the Russians are behaving, or US presidential candidates prattling about China “manipulating its currency” (cheeky irony for a nation that has launched three trillion-dollar money printing campaigns, QE 1, 2 and 3, with QE 4 in the pipeline and no end in sight!).

By contrast, after waiting patiently in silence for decades, the Eurasians simply show what they’ve got, without a word of rhetoric, while the opponent shrieks its scripted outrage at them, like the limbless Black Knight in the Monty Python film “The Holy Grail,” who after being reduced to a trunk and a head, keeps shouting “come back here, cowards” to King Arthur riding off in the distance.

What I am trying to tell you, Dear Reader, is in fact good news in disguise for the long term. While some still theorize that our only enemies are in foreign lands, more and more Americans are waking up to the fact that there is no enemy more hostile or dangerous to our freedoms than the Satanists who control Washington, DC.

While the twisted billionaire elites once openly discussed how they would use “pawns” such as China to impose a stealth plan on its own people to reduce our population, that nation, while pretending to be our vassal, never once had any intention of complying with these babbling fools.

The main goal of the New World Order and Agenda 21 was to reduce world population, possibly by as much as 80%, as suggested here.

However, the new AIIB bank founded by China and sponsored by the BRICS, is working against this goal, helping Third World countries become more prosperous even as Western investment banks seek to bankrupt them. Thus, population reduction is not in the cards. After all, what Third World government would choose the World Bank or IMF as a potential lender when their loans come with a series of distasteful conditions such as forced privatization of the funded project (which usually adds to the cost) or acceptance of the LGBT agenda rejected notably by many majority-Christian African countries. As for war, another card in the New World Order population reduction deck, China and Russia have shown both iron resolve and formidable power, so much so that, since the above-described dazzling shows of Sino-Russian strength and solidarity in Red Square and the Mediterranean, famously Russophobic supranationalist George Soros warned, that there is no way the US and NATO can afford a war with Russia at this point. It seems clear that he fears what some ill-advised fellow Neocons might do to provoke war. Though he didn’t mention China, everyone with a pulse now knows that Russia does not stand alone. Thus if war with Russia is unthinkable, war with China and Russia fighting in tandem is, well, unthinkably unthinkable. Clearly, Agenda 21, which was envisioned as a joint project with China, will not happen with China pulling the other way.


A Greece-Russia sucker punch?

by Don Hank  July 8, 2015

I had just come short of predicting that Tsipras and Putin were hatching a plan and that this explained the Greek hedging on whether to pay that loan and abide by the Troika’s demands or not.

For those who missed it, this is the commentary I wrote:



It turns out I wasn’t the only one thinking along these lines:



The only part I would quibble with is this:


“If Tsipras manages to make this work—pull a BRICS NDB rug out from under the feet of the troika—he will be on the way to being one of the most formidable poker players that Europe has recently seen.”


I don’t know why Karen Szymczak assumes Tsipras would be behind this move. It has Putin’s fingerprints all over it.

Putin loves to pull surprises on the Western elites, who have boasted of creating chaos to exploit for their dirty purposes (like Putin’s new cozy relationship with the Saudis, the wild success of the AIIB luring away US allies by the droves, the new surprise pipeline that will make Germany the new natural gas hub for Europe instead of Ukraine – which is scheduled to have its gas deliveries shut off just in time for the Ukraine to default, oh, right after the Greek default, and need an EU bailout, etc, etc. Did someone say “sanctions”? Make that reverse sanctions, please).

There is one world leader capable of turning the tables on these control freaks who have made a fun pastime out of bankrupting countries to turn them into debt slaves. Here’s the punch you ordered, George Soros! Mess with Russian speaking Ukrainians, will you? Take that, sucker!

Don Hank



Greece Sidesteps While Europe Seethes

Has the Greek wavering over a Grexit in fact concealed a clear-cut strategy from the outset?

Karen Szymczyk

Goodbye to the EU, Hello to BRICS?


With most Western governments betting that one can get used to having one’s head repeatedly banged against a wall, Greece’s majority “no” vote at Sunday’s referendum must have come as somewhat of a surprise. To be honest, there was basis for their thinking.

The referendum consisted of a decision that referenced two documents (“Reforms for the completion of the current program and beyond”, and “Preliminary Debt Sustainability Analysis”) that, in their English translations, came in at thirteen and two pages, respectively. As a comprehension test for undergraduates, they were arcane enough, regardless that most Greek citizens consider themselves to be lay economists by now. And, on that basis alone, the average Western banker would have no doubt rubbed his hands with glee, waiting for the befuddled populace to vote “yes” for the devil they know and be done with it. But the Western-led financiers underestimated the anger of the cash-strapped Greek population. With their decision, the Greeks have bought Syriza and its leader, Alexis Tsipras, more of what he wanted. Time.

Tsipras, it seems, has been operating to a definite strategy. Syriza was elected on a platform of empowering Greece to throw off its austerity shackles, yet almost the first thing Tsipras did as the new Prime Minister was retreat from his blazing rhetoric. There followed round after round of negotiations, brought to the brink each time, before someone (either on the Greek or European finance side) walked out. You could almost set your watch by it.

And there are the questions. If Syriza was so adamant about refusing to bow to the troika’s demands, why the prolonged negotiations and ginger backstepping over the past few months? And why was the referendum timed now and not, say, back in April? One month before, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Shäuble suggested to Greece Finance Minister, Yanis Varoufakis, that Greece can “leave the euro whenever you want”, adding that Germany “will help you in this process.” Not only did that sound final, but a referendum at that point would have made a lot of sense. But Greece didn’t take the bait. And Washington wasn’t pleased.

Washington’s displeasure led to a quick backtrack by Schäuble in late June to the effect that, even if Greece voted against further austerity, it would still stay in the eurozone. The flip-flop can certainly be linked to American concerns—and, therefore, pressure—over the imminent launch of the BRICS New Development Bank (BRICS NDB).


In other words, what matters is not Greece, but what a Greek decision against what the troika of the IMF, European Commission and ECB represents.

While negotiations between Greece and its Western creditors have been limping along, Tsipras has made two recent visits to Moscow, one in April and another in June. The mainstream press have stated categorically that Tsipras’ visits were a failure, with Deutsche Welle’s Barbara Wesel bluntly calling the latest visit “a flop”. But was it?

The BRICS NDB officially opened its doors on July 7. Was this what Tsipras was waiting for? He couldn’t have expected any kind of formal word from Russian President, Vladimir Putin, regarding a way out of Greece’s problems, but he could have begun dropping hints on obtaining much-needed funds from a body other than the troika, setting the groundwork for some very fast financial footwork in July.

Europe is not unaware of this. Its position on the Greek deal has softened alarmingly in recent weeks, ever since Washington put its foot down on a possible Greece expulsion from the eurozone. Concessions have been made; brotherhood statements uttered; the IMF sidelined. Another emergency meeting is scheduled on the day of NDB’s opening, illustrating that the problem isn’t really Greece.

Meanwhile, Greece itself is in a state of crisis. Banks and ATMs are closed, stations are out of petrol, pharmaceutical supplies have dwindled, and supermarket shelves are clearing. As with other populations in times of tension, pensioners, the poor and the sick are the ones suffering the most. And there’s no doubt that Syriza knows it.

What will actually happen remains to be seen, but one thing is certain. If Tsipras manages to make this work—pull a BRICS NDB rug out from under the feet of the troika—he will be on the way to being one of the most formidable poker players that Europe has recently seen.




What’s behind Bolivia’s economic success?

by Don Hank  July 2, 2015

The Mises Institute ran an eye-opening article on Bolivia today, showing that its leftist-populist president Evo Morales has surprised everyone and turned his country into one of the fastest growing economies in the world – a kind of anti-Venezuela. Now since Mises is a libertarian group, opposed to leftist economics, it had some explaining to do and it showed that essentially, Bolivia’s success lies in its ability to circumvent the Washington control freaks of IMF and World Bank, which aim to impoverish and enslave Third World countries with eternal debt and also impose unreasonable social and other demands that interfere with their national sovereignty, such as the requirement to privatize government investments and to enact laws protecting the LGBT class. While privatization has a “free market” ring to it, its goal is to channel multibillion dollar contracts to corporate America and corporate allies. To understand how countries are impoverished by US agents, read the book “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” by John Perkins, who was in fact a hit man for a corporation called MAIN, a CIA front. One of John’s superiors told him point blank that his job was to make economic forecasts by fudging numbers to make it look like poor countries that could not afford big loans could afford big loans, and that the end goal was to bankrupt the countries and thus make them loyal vassals to the US hegemon.

30 years ago, the CIA would have murdered Evo Morales on the pretext that he is a leftist. But the real reason for such murders, like that of Salvador Allende and Omar Torrijos, was that the US elites saw Latin America as their backyard. In other words, as their own personal possession to dispose of as they saw fit. (They have since shifted their attention to Russia, in an attempt to enforce the Wolfowitz doctrine, whose rationale no one seems able to explain.)

For decades, the worldwide pogrom against communism was mostly a veiled attack on the sovereign right of each people to self-determination, with or without cooperation with the US oligarchs who sought to subjugate them in the name of “freedom” and “democracy.” Without the existential threat from the US military, some hardline “communist” countries would have mellowed, as China and Vietnam are doing, developing vibrant capitalist economies. But that was precisely what the Washington elites feared.

We are seeing the latest throes of this struggle in Ukraine, and at one time, Washington would have prevailed.

But there is a new kid on the block now and it is called the AIIB. This Chinese/BRICS bank aims to defeat the dollar hegemony by creating fair lending terms.

Now Third World countries no longer have to bow to the LGBT agenda or the privatization demands of the Washington elites to secure a loan. The avowed aim is to truly allow the Third World to prosper. After all, prosperous clients spend more. (Gee, why didn’t the US elites think of that?)

If you missed my commentary on the AIIB, here it is again http://drrichswier.com/2015/03/18/why-the-world-bank-cant-compete-with-chinese-aiib/

Don Hank

Behind the Greek crisis lurks an oil/gas scam

Comments and translation by Don Hank  July 1, 2015

In the context of the current Greek financial crisis, there isn’t much mention of the recently discovered Greek oil and gas deposits, which the author of the article I have translated below says could contribute greatly to reducing the Greek debt and would make Greece eligible for low-interest loans on the same level as Germany and France, rather than the usurious rates it has paid for years to the Troika (IMF, ECB – European Central Bank, and European Commission. The author makes it clear that these lenders all have cynically held Greece hostage with austerity and unrealistically high interest on loans. These three lenders have done exactly what was described in John Perkins’ book “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.” They are all high level hit men and their goal is to make vassals of their client states.

By now it should obvious that Washington, DC is in fact the enemy not only of the American people (need you look further than the same-sex marriage decision foisted on a Christian nation?) but of all peoples everywhere. Anyone who claims it is un-American to say this is simply cozying up to the Washington Satanists, perhaps unwittingly.

Although the article is written in a jaunty and at times sarcastic style, I was able to verify the main facts on which it is based.

Behind the plot outlined in this post are two main phenomena:

1—The EU Commission, one of the lenders, which is an unelected, and hence dictatorial body. If you scan the article linked in the following, you see, in the context of its constitution, the word “appointed” but not “elected.” It is not answerable to the people and it therefore does not serve their interests, only the interests of a soulless and faceless entity called “Europe.”  The EU Commission, bowing to US pressure, insists on privatization, which deprives the Greek government of the opportunity to extract the oil and gas itself, thereby giving much-needed jobs to Greeks.


2—The imposition of US policies, notably, privatization, which sounds deceptively harmless and suggestive of “free market” but in this context, refers to a subterfuge with the goal of furthering US corporate interests – as distinct from We the People.


Verification : http://www.forbes.com/sites/christophercoats/2013/12/12/how-real-is-greeces-oil-and-gas-future/



The author also takes a swipe at the global warming scam, showing how all 7 of the financiers of the Carbon Disclosure Project are US corporations.


My translation of this eye-opening WidiStrike article is as follows:



Greek crisis: Oil scam lurking in the background


TOO MUCH  is too much … I ACCUSE! (Why the Greek crisis? Here is the hidden answer)

Posted by wikistrike.com on June 29, 2015, 9:15 am

Categories: #Economie

Exclusive WikiStrike


A few months ago, I wrote a post titled “Let’s decolonize Europe’s financial occupation…”

A few weeks ago, I wrote another entitled: This is not a conspiracy but a strategy.

I never thought I would have such a vivid demonstration of the reality of these two observations as I had this morning.

Clearly, Greece possesses in its maritime waters oil and gas deposits of exceptional magnitude and abundance.

This news should make headlines in all newspapers, and a remarkably detailed article was written about it in March 2012 by F. William Engdahl, an American journalist specializing in energy and geopolitical issues.


For thousands of years, the wealth of the subsoil or territorial waters of a country has belonged to the country itself and to its people. There is no need to refer to any ideological doctrine to ensure oneself of this. These deposits would obviously be quite sufficient to allow Greece to reduce its debt.

Foskolos states that there are 22 billion barrels of oil to the south of Crete; he estimates the development prospects of the deposits for 2016-2017, and states that the south of Crete is as rich as Iran.



The laws decreed by the European Commission in 2007 regarding the liberalization of the energy market and the possibility of privatizing public enterprises operating and distributing these resources have allowed US investment banks to appropriate part of the European energy transport infrastructure with impunity, taking advantage a market totally destabilized by the so-called European sovereign debt crisis.

Colonized Europe has now taken one step further, since Noble Energy Company, which was not even at the origin of discoveries of Greek deposits (it was the Greek state itself that publicly commissioned the research), claims 60% of the future production.

According to a report by the political analyst Aristotle Vassilakis published in July 2011, Washington’s goal in pushing Greece and Turkey to join forces in oil and gas lies in the expected revenue share from these deposits. According to the report, Washington proposes that Greece would get 20% of turnover, Turkey 20% and the company US Noble Energy, a company that has already secured drilling in Israeli waters and off the Greek side, get the lion’s share, ie 60%. [12] [Don’s note: Turnover is the sales volume, not the profit. 20% would be quite good depending on what the company spends to extract and sell the product. The main problem is the undemocratic way this deal is being negotiated].

Bill, the husband of Secretary of State Hillary is Washington lobbyist on behalf of Noble Energy. [13]

I don’t think it is necessary to add much comment to this incredible scam, of which the Greek people may again end up the victim – in view of the fact that recently, Germany, via its spokesperson, the CEO of Deutsche Bank, demanded the accelerated privatization of European public services.

The media’s silence is nothing more than active complicity in senseless crimes. I do not know who mentioned financial genocide related to Greece or Europe, but we can now add the terms ‘colonization’ and ‘occupation,’ which are favorites of our media and of course the members of the European commission.  Germany had planned a stimulus package for Greece, including free zones favoring foreign investment with complete market deregulation of the Greek labor market: new European labor camps?

If this information was the minimum reported by the media, the interest on Greek lending would probably be at the same level as those of France and Germany. The financing interest levied on the Greeks, like the austerity plans, are therefore the consequences of a huge scam, in which the media participated by their silence.

Greece is the richest country of all Europe! The interest it pays to borrow should be lower than Germany’s!

Will the next step be a fee charged by American companies on the air we breathe? The carbon tax is already in their hands as shown by the financial actors in the Carbon Disclosure Project, which are:

HSBC, J.P.Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, American International Group, and State Street Corp.

And don’t bother asking who has an interest in the new disinformation campaign on diesel pollution diesel.

Enough is enough, and I don’t think we need to waste words showing that our only priority must be to end colonization and this impermissible rip-off, which is perpetrated with the complicity of those who are supposed to serve the interests of Europe. I wouldn’t exactly title my post “The European Sellout,” but I think that title would not be inappropriate.

A report on these findings was issued on13 January 2012 … NO MEDIA saw fit to carry it, even though it was of paramount importance. So where are the requests for bidding?

So yes:

I blame our technocrats for selling off European interests

I blame elected politicians of facilitating the task.

I blame our media for actively participating, by their shameful silence, in divvying up the pie.

But I wouldn’t say: enjoy the pie, Folks.  Instead I’d say it’s time to return to the resistance. [Don’s note: An allusion to the French resistance against the German occupation in WW II]