500x100

Cato’s Portugal drug study based on false/distorted government data?

Don Hank

The libertarian Cato Institute recently ran a study of the drug situation in Portugal, which legalized drugs de facto in 2001. It published some figures showing how deaths among drug users and some other parameters went down, apparently signaling positive results for the legalization experiment. Scientific American published details on this study and now it is being quoted throughout the world in what seems to be a mammoth push for legalization of drugs everywhere.

But all is not as meets the eye.

Cato is a libertarian institute and part of its agenda is to support the counter-intuitive hypothesis that drug legalization helps reduce the ill effects of drug use.

However, Cato is not known to be a professional medical or scientific group, whose agenda is the health and welfare of their clients.

By contrast, there is an online journal called Saude in Portugal published purely by medical doctors.

Not so surprisingly, their findings differ from those of Cato, which has ignored the negatives and concludes:

“The data show that, judged by virtually every metric, the Portuguese decriminalization framework has been a resounding success.”

 http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10080

Below is my translation of an excerpt from the Saude article, written by Manuel Pinto Coelho, President of the APLD. The world press, always eager to follow the latest trends, has ignored the Portuguese doctors and prefers to disseminate the report of the ideologically based Cato Institute.

It looks like a new policy may again be forged on the basis of statements by political activists rather than professionals who are closest to the problem.

Heroine consumption rose 57.5% in recent years

Model for combating drugs is ‘pure disinformation’ – APLD President

At variance with what official agencies have recently disclosed, the problem of drug dependence in Portugal has never been more serious: Between 2001, the year the decriminalization law went into effect, and 2007, continued consumption of narcotics rose, in absolute terms, by 66%.  

In this period In this period consumption increased 215% for cocaine, 85% for ecstasy, 57.5%  for heroine and 37% for cannabis. These data are from a report of the Institute of Drugs and Drug Dependence (IDT), published in 2008.

Since decriminalization there has been a 50% increase in drug use among young people between the ages of 20 and 24. On the other hand, the number of persons who have experimented with illicit drugs at least once rose from 7.8% in 2001 to 12% in 2007 (IDT Report of Activities of Nov 2008).

End of translation

Saude is an online journal published by medical doctors. Who are you going to believe? Doctors or the government that has driven its government to the brink of bankruptcy?

It is no surprise that journalists the world over would fall for the government data and conclusions. But it is sad to note that Scientific American would take the Cato study at face value without doing any further research. How hard would it have been to ask the doctors of Portugal?

Of course, after hackers found out how scientists at the University of East Anglia falsified meteorological data for political reasons, no one should be surprised. The scientific method has been falling into disuse in academe, even among scientists.

Full Portuguese language text:

http://saude.sapo.pt/noticias/saude-medicina/consumo-de-heroina-cresceu-57-5-nos-ultimos-anos.html

Commentary opposing decriminalization of drugs
http://www.billmuehlenberg.com/1999/07/26/marijuana-decriminalisation-dispelling-the-myths/
Demise of the scientific method:
http://laiglesforum.com/never-the-twain-shall-meet/2473.htm
http://laiglesforum.com/why-the-media-are-out-of-touch-with-reality/2579.htm

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

13 Responses to “Cato’s Portugal drug study based on false/distorted government data?”

  1. Dan Talbot Says:

    You are absolutely correct The drug cartels already have a “market share” which they will be unwilling to concede. Legalizing drugs will simply increase their market. And more druggies means more stoned drivers behind the wheel, poised to wipe out your entire family in a head-on collision.

  2. The second part of the Saude article was inadvertently cut off in my initial posting. Here it is:

    Method for combating drugs is ‘pure disinformation’ – APLD President

  3. [Here is an email I received from a UK contact. Don]

    Forwarded with pleasure.

    I have tried to think softly about the libertarians. Their motto is “If it feels good and no one is catastrophically injured or killed by a pleasurable act – say – within three years, then it ought to be blessed and even government subsidized!.

    This is not working out. Libertarianism scrubbed clean of any ‘Good Samaritan” considerations is purely evil. The truth about legalization of dangerous drugs is available in the writings of James Q. Wilson.

    That some think that Casey Anthony should be freed is the extant rank example.

    Mr. Hank is indubitably correct.

  4. [...] Cato’s Portugal drug study based on false/distorted government data? [...]

  5. [...] Cato’s Portugal drug study based on false/distorted government data? [...]

  6. [...] Cato’s Portugal drug study based on false/distorted government data? [...]

  7. [...] Cato’s Portugal drug study based on false/distorted government data? [...]

  8. [...] Cato’s Portugal drug study based on false/distorted government data? [...]

  9. [...] What I found in my Portuguese-language search (I would never have found it in English) went beyond my wildest dreams, and I published a preliminary article on it here. [...]

  10. Taking the APLD claims at face value, USE of these chemicals went up.

    But what about ABUSE? What about the number of drug related deaths? What about the number of drug-related violent crimes? What about the use of resources that were formerly spent on prohibition enforcement, are they being used to increase the general welfare in Portugal?

    And the comment about “drug cartels increasing their market share” is 100% off base. Did the mob thrive or shrivel after prohibition of alcohol was repealed in the U.S.? Once the market for these drugs is legitimate, there is no incentive for violent criminals to engage in the trade.

    No, prohibition of drugs, even those that you or I absolutely disdain ENCOURAGES violent markets, encourages cutting the drugs with dangerous chemicals, encourages users to hide their habits and the health effects that result.

    This report from the APLD should be taken into advisement, but to focus on this one piece of evidence in the face of numerous other studies on numerous other measures is more dishonest than you claim CATO of being. CATO did not fund or direct the studies they promoted, and unlike the East Anglia debacle, CATO did not compromise the scientists undertaking the studies.

    I applaud your efforts to stay drug-free, and I don’t suggest anyone use heroin or meth, but to suggest that the apparatus of the socialized govt should be used to enforce your worldview on others is nothing but bullying. And bullying people to live “the good life” ends up denying either the bully or the bullied the chance to develop their own morality.

  11. [...] this realization in mind, and also having read, translated and published (here, for example) a report by Portuguese doctors debunking that government’s study fueling a Cato [...]

Leave a Reply

*