Laigle’s Forum

Now that the street mobs are in control of the Middle East, I predict first the unleashing of a fireball throughout the region.  And then after that a flood of crocodile tears from the Western leaders who triggered it. 

by Don Hank

Jim Kouri reports at the Examiner.com that Western coalition forces have launched “Operation Odyssey Dawn” to enforce UN Security Council Resolution 1973 to “protect the Libyan people from that troubled nation’s dictator, according to the Pentagon.”

Kouri’s article mentions criticism of the operation, but this is limited only to the fact that the coalition “places US troops under the command of foreign generals.”

This is very far from the crux of the main issue as recently highlighted by Olavo de Carvalho (here) and myself (here).

As we have stated, the salient outcome of US involvement in each case in

Iran

Kosovo

Iraq and

Egypt

was to take the world step by step closer to a worldwide Caliphate or at least to a world increasingly hostile to Christianity, Jews and Western traditions. And as we pointed out, while this occurred under color of “spreading democracy,” the so-called democratic regimes that sprang up in the power voids we created were much more aggressive toward opposition and much more hostile toward Christians and Jews than the governments Western allies helped overthrow. Libyan rebels are reported to have terror ties. Whereas we once fought, at least ostensibly, to defeat terror, we now fight to defend it, as if it needed our help!

Though many remain in denial about the motives behind this tragic power transfer, it is increasingly clear, particularly in Europe, that the virtually unaccountable  Ruling Class (in the EU, the national and local governments) has adopted policies and laws that are aimed to dismantle Christianity and traditional Judeo-Christian life and culture, at variance with the will of their constituents. The Germans may well have suffered more than the rest of Europe.  Indeed, there are public schools in places like Berlin where up to around 90% of all students are Muslims, many of whom mercilessly attack and insult the German students.

In retrospect, it is perhaps not surprising that after tolerating such abuse for many years, a German TV station picked up the story. Laigle’s Forum was one of the first US media outlets to report this to US audiences.

Within days, Chancellor Angela Merkel became the first top-level European leader to state unequivocally “Multikulti” (multiculturalism) is not working.

Not long thereafter, David Cameron, normally a lackey of the Ruling Class, said the same thing. So did France’s Sarkozy.

Now European leaders at this level never flout the top brass (in the EU, for example) in this way unless their jobs are at stake. For the first time in decades, the pressure was coming from the people, building to a crescendo and inviting revolt.

The point is that the Ruling Class in the West has been using Muslims as a means of undermining Christian culture, and the support of Islamic rioters in Northern Africa is but an extension of this policy. A hotelier couple in the UK, for example, was recently sued in court for sharing their faith with a Muslim guest. Homosexual “sensitivity” is also used on both sides of the Atlantic to suppress Christian thought and speech. The connection to the anti-Christian tone of US leaders (on all levels), with the ACLU and the Southern Poverty Law Center making constant juridical sorties against Christians, is abundantly clear to anyone with internet access and palpable brain wave activity.

So given the above list of Islamic nations that has received military support, it is not unusual that the West would leap to the support of a group of radicals who want to overthrow the Libyan regime, even though Libya has had one of the highest standards of living in the region and a more highly developed network of social services, and even though Qadaffi had in the past shown remarkable cooperativeness with the West, even voluntarily dismantling his weapons systems.

So now there are 5 regions in the hands of another wild street mob, thanks to the intervention of the West. Watch the prices soar at the pump. Watch for streams of Middle Eastern Christian refugees in Western countries.

Watch Israel as Islam moves in for the kill.

Watch for crocodile tears as the Western leaders who triggered the debacle react with false shock and indignation at the blood bath they deliberately initiated.

Further reading:

Western support for radical Islam

http://laiglesforum.com/why-i-am-not-on-our-side-any-more/2174.htm

Olavo de Carvalho on Western support for radical Islam

http://laiglesforum.com/danger-ahead-part-i/2106.htm

Article at the Examiner on Operation Odyssey Dawn

http://www.examiner.com/law-enforcement-in-national/operation-odyssey-dawn-launched-against-khadhafi-s-regime

Libyan rebels tied to terror

http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2011/03/17/libyan-rebellion-has-radical-islamist-fervor-benghazi-link-islamic-militancyus-milit

por Don Hank

Recientemente, un activista chileno enfrentó a David Rockefeller en el aeropuerto y le dijo en inglés: “vete de Chile”.  Aunque la Izquierda declara que Matías Rojas (vea enlace abajo) tiene motivos anti-capitalistas, en realidad no es ni anti-americano ni marxista. Es uno de los pocos analistas que ha notado que el viejo paradigma caracterizado por una tensión más o menos igual entre la Izquierda y la Derecha está vencido. Según el análisis de F. Hayek, sería más apropiado hablar de una dicotomía entre Gobierno grande (o sea un gobierno entrometido y coercitivo) y Gobierno limitado. De urgencia primordial para Rojas es oponerse a los élites del Nuevo Orden Mundial y a su creciente control (en forma de Gobierno grande) sobre todo aspecto de nuestra vida en el contexto tanto local como global.

Un creciente número de personas como Rojas se da cuenta de que el capitalismo ya casi no existe en el Oeste. Desde hace décadas, el capitalismo va remplazándose por un sistema híbrido, o sea una combinación de los intereses gubernamentales de un lado y los particulares del otro en un sistema coordinado mundial cada vez más entrelazado, profundo, impenetrable y corrupto. A este sistema algunos ya lo denominan de “fascismo”, otros de “corporatismo”. Sirviéndose de este sistema, los élites controlan cada vez más nuestra vida, dañan la economía mundial y reducen drásticamente la libertad individual.

En EEUU, la Fed sigue imprimiendo dólares, análogamente a un cocinero quien, al llegar más invitados, le echa a la sopa más agua pero sin echarle más ingredientes. Como la sopa diluida que resulta de tal práctica, el dólar no puede no perder su valor. Es más, los rescates de los bancos en EEUU y Europa le roban los frutos de la labor a la clase media (cada vez más chica) para pagarles a los millonarios que por sus acciones irresponsables desencadenaron la crisis financiera, económica y laboral que vivimos.

Tales acciones por parte de la Clase Dirigente occidental (Norteamérica, Europa, parte de América Latina) encarecen nuestra vida cada vez más, convirtiéndonos en esclavos del sistema gubernamental-comercial-banquero, el cual por miles de enlaces mayoritariamente secretos, redundan en su beneficio y los enriquecen.

Es a esa dictadura corrupta que Rojas se opone. Vea abajo.

http://gonzaloantinwo.wordpress.com/2011/01/28/matias-rojas-chileno-increpo-david-rockefeller/

Citatación de Rojas:

Independiente de la corriente política que compartas, Agustín Edwards es cómplice de conspirar con células de inteligencia extranjeras para influenciar la gestión política local chilena (principalmente en el período previo al golpe de Estado en 1973). He leído a muchas personas tratándome de “comunista” por hacer lo que hice. Yo les diría que la Fundación Rockefeller y el consorcio petrolero del Sr. Rockefeller ha estado involucrada en financiar ambos bandos del espectro político. La élite a la cual pertenece este señor está dispuesta a colaborar con cualquier modelo dictatorial que exista. Volviendo a Edwards, “El Mercurio” también sirvió como filtro para culpar injustamente al ciudadano pakistaní Mohammed Saif Ur Rehman Khan e instalar la idea de un terrorismo islámico en Chile, mediante el acceso a dudosa documentación de células chilenas “de inteligencia” en el país. El imperio mediático de Agustín Edwards es un brazo más de las sombras de élite. Un ejemplo de eso es la presidencia de un ancestro de Agustín, llamado Agustín Edwards McClure, en la Liga de Naciones durante 1922-23. Nótese que la familia Rockefeller, una vez que la Liga de Naciones falló, hizo lo posible por promover la Organización de Naciones Unidas (ONU), e incluso donó los terrenos que actualmente sirven para sus cuarteles generales en New York. La historia se repite.

By Don Hank

Chinese leader Wen Jiaobao went to the EU-China summit a few days ago and told the EU he won’t revalue the renminbi upward, and that they should stop “pressurising” China to do so. He said the problem with the euro is the fluctuation of the dollar. That would put the ball in Obama’s court.

To drive home Wen’s point that China won’t take orders, the Chinese leadership recently blanked out all cyber searches in China pertaining to the Nobel prize, which went to a jailed Chinese dissident. And it wasn’t just mention of the dissident that they blanked out. It was the search term “Nobel.” To make sure people paid attention, they threatened sanctions against Norway for its role in the decision, even though the Norwegian government has no known hand in the decision to award the prize.

So why so many slaps in Western faces all at once? If you read between the lines, there really was one main target face, and that was Barack Obama’s.

You may recall that at the Copenhagen Climate Conference, Obama had to track down his Chinese counterpart, who was deliberately snubbing him. This, coupled with China’s past warning regarding the adverse effects of Obama’s stimulus spending, and now this Chinese stance toward Brussels and Norway, should tell you something.

The Chinese leadership is not just rejecting the West’s praise for one of its dissidents. Much more significantly than that, it is showing its contempt for the arrogant group that granted the unknown Marxist upstart Barack Obama a Nobel Prize but was at a loss to explain why it had done so. Coincidence or not, this indirect but transparent sullying of Obama comes right around election time when Americans are looking to a dazed Obama (who has lost a significant amount of both popularity and cabinet members) for a sign that he can lead.

As I pointed out here, the Chinese leaders have moved safely beyond Marxism, having (barely) survived the murderous ravages of Marxist true-believer Mao. The fact that Obama is enamored of Maoist schemes is almost certainly not lost on them. Yes, technically, they are communists, and Mao is still celebrated, mostly for the sake of his useful idiot followers, but that’s as far as it goes.

This anti-Mao sentiment in the leadership is no secret. As soon as Mao died, Deng Xioaping’s government reversed Mao’s virulent anti-capitalist stance and propagated the slogan “to get rich is glorious.” It even tolerated films critical of Mao’s leadership. (Probably the most powerful and best-made of these is “To Live,” which you can rent from Blockbuster or buy, for example, from Amazon).

The Chinese leadership knows that a man holding the office of President of the United States has no business honoring their disgraced past leader. On a visceral level, I believe they cannot help but resent Obama for admiring the man who almost destroyed their country, and their actions so far have not dissuaded me of this conviction. To the contrary, the Chinese leaders are showing for Obama the same contempt he showed for the Israeli Prime Minister. Politics is, after all, personal, despite the lofty pronouncements of its practitioners. But on a purely pragmatic level, they must be anxious to have Obama replaced by a president less intent on weakening America’s economy through astronomical borrowing and spending – a president who will strengthen their most important trading partner (what can they sell to a poor country?).

The Chinese contempt of Obama is ignored by the power elite in the West because it is not compatible with their diplomatic philosophy, and they are clearly in denial.

Western elites have taught for many years that government should always speak easy and carry no stick but Chamberlain-like appeasement and dhimmitude.

Hence, the US and the EU have, in recent years, trodden easy with China, careful never to rile her leadership.

Obama, while pretty much sticking to this elitist playbook, has departed from it in his China encounters, flush with a false sense of power throughout the West. For example, in February 2010 he blustered that he would get much tougher with China. After all, he is the most powerful man in the world, right? He was cheered like a conqueror in Europe during his campaign. He commanded the attention of the entire Western ruling class, even winning a Nobel without lifting a finger. Can’t the Chinese also plainly see that Obama was a god?

Just as liberal leftists truly believe in Keynesian economics (what Reagan called “voodoo economics” – namely, the doctrine that government can spend itself out of an economic crisis), they just as devoutly believe that anything can be accomplished at the bargaining table that was once won on the battle field, particularly when one is surrounded by a large alliance when facing down a foe.

Thus the reigning principle in Western statesmanship is “strength in numbers” – i.e., the notion that supranational groups like the UN and the EU combine enough synergism and population volume that no single country can resist their efforts.

What they have forgotten is the overriding principle that, all things being equal, there is more power in patriotism, national pride and admiration for a wise and skillful nationalist leader than in a soulless, cultureless union of dissimilar states held together at the top by power lust and self-interest but dangling loose at the bottom, particularly when the leaders of these allied states have intentionally waged a years-long culture war against their own increasingly resentful people.

There comes a point at which people have been so indoctrinated with anti-patriotic propaganda that they ask themselves: Who cares if my side wins? 

That point is now in Europe and soon in America.

Napoleon demonstrated this principle at Austerlitz when, with 70,000 men, he defeated the 90,000 man strong combined forces of 2 Empires, Russia and Austria – and then turned around and defeated the Prussians just to show who was boss.

It will always be this way. Some nations rule, others lose, and when national pride and the will to triumph meet an alliance of forces dissimilar in culture, tongues, and religions, and a vanishing sense of what they stand for, the multicultural alliance had better tread carefully.

There may be strength in numbers, but, as China is teaching us, there is only weakness in diversity.

Further reading:

http://laiglesforum.com/obama-and-mao-a-short-history-lesson/1870.htm

By Don Hank

This year puny little man declared that HE and he alone must control a runaway climate and decided to tax the beejeebers out of the rich countries to pay the poor countries, boasting that this would surely stop “global warming” and save the planet. And all of this on the strength of data that did not rise to the rigor needed to prove warming was happening, only tendentious reports from the University of East Anglia, charged by the politically motivated IPCC with providing scientific data but, as shown by hackers, in reality sending massaged numbers trimmed to fit their assumptions.
Then, as usual, just as man was gearing up to play his stint as God, an uninvited Guest showed up and Europe experienced a near-record snow and cold streak that all but shut down the Copenhagen conference on climate change.
Al Gore lost his nerve and stayed home the first week. The leaders of China and India balked.
A near-record snow fell outside the White House to remind our “leaders” of their impotence and foolishness.
Then came the earthquakes, Haiti, Chile, China, tremors in Mexico and California.
And now comes the Icelandic volcano of Eyjafjallajökull that shut down air traffic indefinitely in Europe. Who can we carbon-tax to control all of this? Will wealth redistribution stop the belching goliath or raise the dead in Port au Prince and Santiago and rebuild structures resembling piles of matchsticks as seen from the air?
Whom do we punish with cap and trade for causing these disasters? Was it the rich again? White Christians? The Tea Party movement? Homophobes perhaps?
One thing is certain: There is nothing like a slowly erupting volcano to block the sun’s rays and create a worldwide cold spell. No amount of smokestack or auto emissions can even come close to the effect. This year, crops will not be the same, if indeed we get any.
Isn’t it time man showed some humility?
Or will he continue to play Russian roulette with the Almighty and wait for the BIG one? After all, this might all be just a little a warm-up.

http://www.the912project.us/forum/topics/volcano-air-travel-disruption?commentId=2881797%3AComment%3A739923&xg_source=msg_com_forum

Klaus caved. Keep signing anyway!

By Don Hank

I want to thank those who signed the petition. You did the right thing. I think Vaclav Klaus would have held out, but his advisors probably told him “they have all the cards.”

Laigle’s Forum received a thank you note from Klaus this weekend for the support we gave him, and I don’t think it is naïve to say he meant it. Others who emailed or wrote him reported that he had also thanked them personally.

He was beaten down. But his reasons for opposing Lisbon were not the right ones. He was concerned about the Sudetenland, which is a WW II issue. Not that the issue is or ever was settled, but the point is, the salient issue of the EU was simply the dictatorial nature of the beast. It was not a Czech issue. It forces all national governments to bend to its will in matters of conscience, for example, by introducing the notion of “hate” into law, where it has no business being. Hate is a private matter and must be resolved on the private level. If it can’t be resolved, then that is still not a matter for the State.

The EU will decay and fail for lack of moral authority, but before it does, it will drag down nations that could have been perfectly good with a little free debate and a grain of faith.

But free debate will be banned. For the foreseeable future.

The 1000 years of darkness Ronald Reagan spoke of is in the works.

From a human standpoint, there is one last chance: a truly conservative party could be elected in the UK and demand another referendum there. It is likely that, should this happen, the people there would reject Lisbon or whatever they would be calling the treaty by then.

For this reason, I am asking: Please continue to sign the petition, even though Vaclav Klaus is no longer the subject. The petition started averaging about 1,000 signatures a day after Laigle’s Forum got involved.

Klaus knew that if he could have held out, there was this chance of the UK being encouraged to leave the EU. You and I know that there still is this chance because most of us are people of faith.

But the UK must be a moral force before it is a political force. If the people there continue to reject God and His mandates, and allow Islam and/or humanism to supplant Him, then nothing they do or say will save them because a rigid, near-totalitarian socialism is then the only option and that does not work, never has. They can march, they can organize, they can protest, they can sue, they can petition. It won’t do a bit of good. A spiritual revival and a humble, praying populace is the real hope of that nation and all others.

I appeal to Mr. Klaus to look to his only Hope as well. Please pray for him to find the way, the truth and the life. Sign the petition and alert your friends to it, prayerfully, as a show of faith.

And one more thing: If you decide to pray in love for Mr. Klaus, let him know this by sending him a brief email to his various offices.

The following is my email in response to his signing of the treaty:

Dear President Klaus,

I recently devoted a few days of my time to urging people to sign a petition encouraging you not to sign the treacherous Lisbon document. I did so because I believe you are one in a million. You are different from the others. I know you did not want to sign and felt pressured. I am not upset or angry at you for doing this, particularly since many Europeans had warned me that you probably would. I know you did it because you are thinking and acting in your own power, having been educated as a European humanist.

However, as you can see, the fruits of humanism inevitably end in slavery to the many by the few. This is because of a principle enunciated in the Bible: There is a way that seems right to men but the end thereof are the ways of death. This principle has led, for example, to over 100 million deaths of the unborn in the world, to the worship of “sexual orientations” that bring disease and unhappiness to millions, and to laws that “protect” people from information that could show them how to stay healthy in mind and body by avoiding these; laws that “protect” non-Christians but fill European cities with angry mobs, countless welfare cases, a surge in rape and prostitution, which threaten your safety, while making Christian speech all but illegal. Don’t you see life being supplanted by death here? It is as plain as the nose on your face. Yet you have ignored this totalitarian aspect of the EU while harping on the Sedetenland, as if the treatment of Czech Germans were the salient evil of the day. This issue is so terribly irrelevant to the rest of Europe! You should have stood up for honest hardworking traditional Europeans who love their homelands and their God, but you were blind to their pain and suffering.

Therefore, I invite you to think on a higher level from now on. Believe it or not, God loves you and wants to use you for His glory.

Freedom comes from within our hearts, not from powerful politicians, laws or treaties.  Therefore, please focus on making Europe free, with or without the EU, not as the President of the Czech Republic but as a redeemed human being, because that is so much, so much more. Repentance is the first step. Redemption is the next. The rest are automatic. For further instructions, see the Holy Bible.

God bless you and keep you!

Don Hank

libuse.schmidova@hrad.cz

jiri.weigl@hrad.cz;

petr.hajek@hrad.cz;

petr.muzak@hrad.cz;

zuzana.rycova@hrad.cz;

jindrich.forejt@hrad.cz;

ladislav.mravec@hrad.cz;

dana.rimanova@hrad.cz;

radim.bures@hrad.cz;

libuse.schmidova@hrad.cz;

Don Hank

‘Too late’ to stop Lisbon Treaty, concedes last EU leader left to sign

By Daily Mail Reporter

Czech president Vaclav Klaus said he could not block the EU treaty

The only EU leader who has not yet signed the Lisbon reform treaty has conceded he will not be able to derail it.

Czech President Vaclav Klaus’s admission has paved the way for the document to become law.

The treaty has already been signed by the leaders of the other 26 EU states but had been put in doubt by Mr Klaus’s last-minute objection over World War Two property claims.

Some had speculated he wanted to delay signing until after a general election in Britain, in the hope the Conservatives would be victorious and call a referendum.

Mr Klaus said: ‘I will not and cannot wait for the British election. They would have to hold it in the coming days or weeks.’

He had demanded an opt-out to shield his country from property claims by Germans expelled after the war.

The new hurdle raised concern it could require new talks and another agreement by all EU members, threatening to undo years of diplomatic work to create an acceptable treaty.

But eurosceptic Mr Klaus, an admirer of Margaret Thatcher, told newspaper Lidove Noviny that despite his opposition to the charter, it had gone too far for him to stop it.

He said: ‘I do not consider the Lisbon Treaty to be a good thing for Europe, for the freedom of Europe, or for the Czech Republic.

‘However, the train has already travelled so fast and so far that I guess it will not be possible to stop it or turn it around, however much we would wish to.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1221079/Vaclav-Klaus-Too-late-stop-Lisbon-Treaty-concedes-EU-leader-left-sign.html#ixzz0UQAQWMLR