Global cooling and the New World Order

October 2nd, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Climate change, Global governance No Comments »

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100055500/global-cooling-and-the-new-world-order/

Global Cooling and the New World Order

By James Delingpole Politics Last updated: September 26th, 2010

Bilderberg. Whether you believe it’s part of a sinister conspiracy which will lead inexorably to one world government or whether you think it’s just an innocent high-level talking shop, there’s one thing that can’t be denied: it knows which way the wind is blowing. (Hat tips: Will/NoIdea/Ozboy)

At its June meeting in Sitges, Spain (unreported and held in camera, as is Bilderberg’s way), some of the world’s most powerful CEOs rubbed shoulders with notable academics and leading politicians. They included: the chairman of Fiat, the Irish Attorney General Paul Gallagher, the US special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke, Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates, Dick Perle, the Queen of the Netherlands, the editor of the Economist…. Definitely not Z-list, in other words.

Which is what makes one particular item on the group’s discussion agenda so tremendously significant. See if you can spot the one I mean:

The 58th Bilderberg Meeting will be held in Sitges, Spain 3 – 6 June 2010. The Conference will deal mainly with Financial Reform, Security, Cyber Technology, Energy, Pakistan, Afghanistan, World Food Problem, Global Cooling, Social Networking, Medical Science, EU-US relations.

Yep, that’s right. Global Cooling.

Which means one of two things.

Either it was a printing error.

Or the global elite is perfectly well aware that global cooling represents a far more serious and imminent threat to the world than global warming, but is so far unwilling to admit it except behind closed doors.

Let me explain briefly why this is a bombshell waiting to explode.

Almost every government in the Western world from the USA to Britain to all the other EU states to Australia and New Zealand is currently committed to a policy of “decarbonisation.” This in turn is justified to (increasingly sceptical) electorates on the grounds that man-made CO2 is a prime driver of dangerous global warming and must therefore be reduced drastically, at no matter what social, economic and environmental cost. In the Eighties and Nineties, the global elite had a nice run of hot weather to support their (scientifically dubious) claims. But now they don’t. Winters are getting colder. Fuel bills are rising (in the name of combating climate change, natch). The wheels are starting to come off the AGW bandwagon. Ordinary people, resisting two decades of concerted brainwashing, are starting to notice.

Read more.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The border crisis and cognitive dissonance

September 26th, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Censorship, Climate change, Political Correctness 6 Comments »

The border crisis and cognitive dissonance

by Don Hank

The lack of response and negative response of many Americans to my recent article on the dangerous crisis at the US-Mexican border signals the existence of a sweeping epidemic of the mental disorder known as cognitive dissonance.

We often think of cognitive dissonance in terms of two different world views that one and the same person entertain. A well-known example is the compartmentalization practiced by some Christians who believe in Darwinism on a secular level and the Genesis version of creation on a religious level.

But in the case of the West, a much more serious and virulent form of cognitive dissonance frequently occurs in the minds of citizens whose “background noise” in the form of media reports and opinions, political activism, make us deny what our eyes and ears perceive. In other words, the victim is not only contending with 2 distinct and contradictory world views, which can cause neurosis. He or she is actually trapped (brain washed, we could call it) into believing something that his senses unerringly tell him is not true.

The most amazing example of this more radical form of cognitive dissonance that I have ever witnessed was when, in the midst of the “global warming” craze, a record late frost occurred in my area in PA and not only did the media not report it, but many of the locals with whom I spoke, even as the frost lay on the ground in full view, appeared visibly nervous and edgy when I mentioned that I had never seen frost this late in over 65 years living in the area. Of course, neither had they, but they couldn’t say so because they were supposed to devoutly believe in global warming — and not as the result of scientific study but as a result of fervent devotion of a mystical type not to be confused with brain activity. The belief would save humankind from extinction if only we believed fervently and acted upon our beliefs by accepting whatever remedies the government and the Self-Elect recommended. Praise Gaya!

The very same phenomenon is at work when people mention things like the murder of Arizona rancher Robert Krentz by illegal aliens. Many absolutely can’t process this information and exhibit an evasive response when confronted with it. They literally dodge anyone who mentions it. Like Pavlov’s dogs, they have been conditioned. They dare not entertain such dissident thoughts, let alone discuss the issue with anyone. They not only feel guilty about having this information, because it contradicts the received wisdom that all Hispanics are victims and we evil rich Americans are their tormenters and are responsible for all ills that befall them. They also are deathly afraid that an activist could be lurking somewhere waiting to pounce on them for the indiscretion of stating a simple fact. None of these Hispanics who sin, so goes the narrative, can be held accountable for their actions. If they smuggle drugs, it is our fault because some Americans use drugs. If they rape someone it is because American women are racists who deny them love. If they join violent gangs it is because we xenophobic Anglos reject them and their language, forcing them to seek solace among their own kind.

I hope and pray I am wrong, but I am slowly coming to the conclusion that cognitive dissonance is now an epidemic of such enormous proportions in our country that, if someday Hispanics swept through middle class neighborhoods burning, pillaging, raping, murdering and shouting racial slurs against whites and blacks alike, a sizeable proportion of the residents of these neighborhoods would actually feel guilty about being “rich” and white (no matter that the Hispanics hated the blacks as well) and would ask: Where have we gone wrong? What can we do to show them we are their friends?

If my suspicions about that are correct, this could be the end of the line.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The Great Vanity meets the Great Indifference

June 19th, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Climate change, religion, The Left 1 Comment »

by Don Hank

It has been discovered that the wildcat BP oil well at the bottom of the Gulf is actually an enormous methane deposit that is becoming more and more unstable and threatens to blow with incalculable force and unknown consequences for nature and man.

Whether he acknowledges it or not, Barack Obama is gradually encountering a profound and inscrutable truth, and that is:

No matter how well a vain man plays God, he is only playing. There is Someone for whom the role was made, and He is not playing.

As was demonstrated by the near-record snow storm during the Supremely Vain Men’s conference on global warming in Copenhagen, and again when a volcano polluted the atmosphere more than all the cars in the world and could not be taxed into submission, there is an all-encompassing Vastness that even a dyed-in-the-wool far-left secularist like Obama must eventually acknowledge (if only by confronting death), something that this secularist might — lacking a better term or feeling inhibited by a supremely vain Supreme Court decision — call the Great Indifference of the universe, which is oblivious to people like Obama who dream of greatness and audacity, a force that cares even less about the usurper than does the usurper about his subjects.

Indifference is normally a passive phenomenon, and Obama might expect its effects to be tolerable, not much worse than a bout of loneliness. Yet there is something about the Great Indifference that is beginning to feel more active and positive to Obama than mere non-existence could feel and, despite his mask of studied aplomb, he is increasingly aware of its existence.

There is a haunting, mocking feel to it that grows more certain with each passing day and is becoming less and less tolerable. It’s an emptiness that rings in the ears, floods the senses. But with what does it fill and flood you, Barack Obama, if indeed nothing is there, as your masters have assured you? What or who is mocking you? Bodily chemistry perhaps? Or the machinations of the vast rightwing conspiracy, as a person of slightly inferior vanity and emptiness once postulated?

Being ignored by nothing is manageable. But Obama must by now sense that there is a compelling yet elusive substance to this nothingness, a realness which is everlasting and demands a bending of the knees, a falling to the ground with a groaning lament.

The drama of the Great Fall, about to unfold, promises to be uniquely compelling because no one has ever so fully embodied the Supremely Vain Men’s desire for a godman than does Obama, and no man, not even the inscrutable yellow Khan, has ever felt so comfortable with, and worthy of, the role. He is his own most adoring devotee.

And this is why the godman and the prophets who installed him will now see a perfect storm unleashed against the perfect embodiment of narcissist vanity that they have groomed to impersonate deity.

For they have come up against another immutable law of nature, which can be written thusly:

He who will not lead with wisdom will be led by circumstances.

The immovable object is about to meet the unstoppable force, which lurks in the entrails of the earth under the Gulf of Mexico ready to explode with all the fury of hell.

Full report:

http://www.aolnews.com/gulf-oil-spill/article/natural-gas-threat-methane-danger-in-gulf-of-mexico-oil-spill-disaster/19521698

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

It’s official: Petroleum is a waste product

June 14th, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Climate change, Political Correctness, The Left 7 Comments »

by Don Hank

A clear-cut obvious and elegant solution to the BP oil spill is now available and its use would not violate union rules.

As Gergory Sullivan reports in Pajamas Media:

“John Lapoint of Packgen in Auburn, Maine, says he’s got plenty of floating oil containment boom and can make lots more on short notice. There’s just one problem: no one will buy it from him.”

Obama, the man who claims not to have slept since the spill, and BP, whose shareholders need the revenues from the recovered oil, aren’t interested in this elegant solution to the greatest environmental disaster ever.

By simply recovering and selling the spilled oil, accumulated in large masses all over the Gulf surface, BP could pay for the cleanup and have money left over to divide among its shareholders.

But you see, there’s a hitch:  Doing so would be an object lesson and a reminder to the world that petroleum is a valuable product, not waste to be eliminated, a concept that runs counter to wisdom received from on high.

For decades, Americans have heard the subliminal message that products once deemed useful are in fact waste and need to be eliminated to save the planet. CO2 has always been a plant food, always will be, but not in the eyes of severely brainwashed Homo sapiens. Throughout the planet people now firmly believe that CO2 is a toxin.

But few realize, and no one articulates, that, like CO2, petroleum (a product demonized by the Left since the earliest times) is now also officially becoming a waste product and is seen as such by just about everyone. This is best illustrated by a well known YouTube presentation showing 2 gentlemen cleaning oily water with hay.

It works too.

They suggest the oil-soaked hay could subsequently be incinerated.

Brilliant. Except that, firstly, hay is a valuable and costly product and there is not enough on the whole planet to soak up the BP spill. And secondly, whatever happened to the concept of salvaging oil, the product that is quoted daily on the commodities exchange, rather than incinerating it like so much garbage? BP went to the enormous expense and effort to drill a hole in the sea floor to get the stuff, ostensibly to recover and sell it.

But now that the stuff has leaked out unexpectedly and is right there where they can skim it off, centrifuge it and put it on a tanker for sale to eager buyers, what has happened?

They are treating it in accordance with the post-modern viewpoint, promulgated everywhere in media, the education system and even in world governments, that oil is a toxin that when burned forms CO2, another toxin. Therefore, to recover it and use it for the purpose intended by BP shareholders would sully the sensitivities of all good people everywhere who care about air quality.

Makes you wonder what they were really up to in the first place.

The longer the crude sits on the Gulf surface, the more the low-boiling volatile components, such as gasoline, will evaporate, not only harming the atmosphere environmentalists claim to care about, but also poisoning the soil onto which it precipitates. And of course, becoming unrecoverable as a product. But the Left, from the Sierra Club to the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) never once cared about the environment or you, and this refusal by BP and Obama to recover it is hard evidence of that lack of concern for the environment. The Left’s only mission is to destroy all existing systems, traditions, science, technology, business, religion, all things needed for life, because these things run counter to its ideology of perpetual “change,” its designs on total control in general and on mind control over every human being in particular.

So they are willfully sacrificing the oceans to preserve the air – killing mother earth to “save” it.

After years of brainwashing by the media and the enviro-marxists, it’s official, both in governments and in big business: oil is no longer a product. It is instead a pollutant that must be discarded – preferably soaked up and burned off. From the lowliest of the grassroots to the highest officials of BP and its partner in the White House – America and the rest of the world have bought into this insanity.

Thus, ironically, it was the enviro-Marxists, their followers in the top echelons, and now even the useful idiots on the grassroots level, who have created the most portentous threat to Mother earth in all of history!

The disaster came to us from top down. The only way it can be fixed is from the bottom up. You must end this madness by first understanding how it happened and why, and then actively opposing the Left (including RINOs) in every possible way, including at the polls.

Politics is no longer a matter of ideological preferences. It is a matter of survival, for you and all living things.

Further reading(union rules prohibit saving the Gulf):

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=166265

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/24206
“it’s been widely reported that a major part, a major part of the Kerry-Lieberman bill [“cap-and-trade”] was essentially written by BP.”  “Let me say that again. A major part of the Kerry-Lieberman bill was written by BP.” —Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on the Senate floor, June 9, 2010
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

FAO paper: Fuel combustion the least significant CO2 source

June 8th, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Climate change, Global governance, International 1 Comment »

by Don Hank

Stop breathing, now!

UN organizations like the FAO are pushing the idea that cattle growing is bad for “climate change,” causing too much “greenhouse gases” to be generated, mostly by the burning of fossil fuel in growing their feed but also by their “wind”.

Yet in one of their papers, they admit that fossil fuel burning generates only 5 billion tonnes of carbon per year, while respiration of animals generates 50 billion tonnes/yr. See page 85, Table 3.2 of this doc:

ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a0701e/a0701e03.pdf

They are admitting that our fossil fuel use causes only a tenth of the CO2 output into the atmosphere, the rest being natural.

The unmistakable message, though subliminal and nowhere pointed out, is that animals, including people, must all die to save the planet.

So breathing is an ecological crime against… humanity? Wait, humanity is the crime.

It is high time Europe threw off the yoke of the EU that promulgates this toxic nonsense. Eurpeans need home rule and the right to feel proud of their resepective nations. It is time America threw out the Democrats who poison our minds and our children’s minds with this nihilistic One-World Government propaganda.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t feel guilty about driving a car or breathing — not even about exhaling. I don’t feel guilty about having children and raising them in a god-fearing environment. And my family and I will eat meat and drink milk and we will apologize to no one. We know that the “climate change” is a hoax and the hoaxers will eventually be brought to justice.

May God have more mercy on them than they have had on us.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button