Another judge plays lawmaker

August 5th, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Gay agenda, Homosexual Agenda, Judiciary 1 Comment »

by Gregg Jackson

Homosexual activist judge’s opinion that CA Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as one man one woman as “unconstitutional” is utterly absurd and should be ignored!

Today, homosexual activist San Francisco U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker (George H.W. Bush appointee) issued an opinion that Prop 8, amended into law by California Voters in 2008, which defines marriage as limited to one man-one woman, is “unconstitutional.”

Here we go again.

Most headlines cite how Judge Walker “struck down” the so-called “gay marriage ban.”

For starters, judges can’t “strike down” any law whether it be a statute or constitutional amendment such as Prop 8. And it is a shame that so many “conservative” lawyers continue to parrot this toxic liberal lie. Judges may hear individual cases and rule on them as long as they have jurisdiction. But judges don’t possess any legislative authority. Period!

The judge did have subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case and issue a ruling. But a judge’s opinion isn’t law.

The only way the actual constitutional amendment, Prop 8,may be altered or overturned in any way is via another constitutional amendment, according to the California Constitution itself. Only the voters may revoke or overturn a constitutional amendment or initiative statute.

Thus, one man-one woman marriage is still the law of the land unless and until the voters amend the constitution to revoke it.

Schwarzennegger already pulled a “Mitt Romney” once by unilaterally, illegally and unconstitutionally authorizing changes to and issuance of marriage licenses without a binding, enabling, accompanying statute in direct violation of his constitutionally sworn oath to enforce the law (as opposed to unconstitutional court opinions).

For that every pro-family Christian legal organization in America should have called for The Gilie-Man’s impeachment. (Which none of them did since almost all of them from Liberty Council to the ACLJ to ADF believe the lie that judges actually can make law).

Read more http://greggjackson.com/blog/?p=508 .

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Did Paul mean “homosexual” or “man ogler”?

May 7th, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Gay agenda, Homosexual Agenda, religion 2 Comments »

by Don Hank

This will be of particular interest to theologians and linguists but it is in fact a debunking of a biblical misinterpretation that is relevant to all of us.

The “gay” agenda has been trying hard to make the Apostle Paul unsay what, according to most translations, he said about homosexuality. One Greek “scholar” has written that the word he used in Corinthians did not mean homosexual at all.

The verse in question is I Cor. 6:9 and the disputed term is arsenokoitai (plural of aresnokoitis). There is no dispute over the rest of the verse.

I found aresnokoitis in my Ancient Greek dictionary “The Classic Greek Dictionary” (Follet, 1948) and the puritanical definition given there is “one guilty of unnatural offenses.” This is homosexual in Prudish and is based on the fact that arseno- meant male (still does in modern GR) and koitos meant “lying (eg, in bed).” The context in Paul’s letter and his remarks on homosexuality elsewhere are clear evidence that he did really mean homosexual.

The translations of Paul’s word here is usually “Sodomite” or “homosexual” in today’s Bibles but “gay” lobbyists are keen on changing that translation and have even sued at least one Bible publisher for using it.

The “gay” lobby has been tampering with this interpretation for so many years that even modern native Greek people often believe (thanks, I surmise, to their international effort to revise the scriptures) that, although the word has survived today and means “homosexual,” it originally supposedly meant “a man who looks at other men” and some are saying that this was once illegal so Paul was just condemning the practice of men looking at other men — man oglers, one might say.

However, there are several reports in the NT of Jesus having looked at men, such as Simon Peter. So that holds no water.

They are basing this mostly on the fact that the stem of the -koitos part is from the verb koitazo, which in Modern Greek means “to look.”

The problem is that, while koitazo means “to look” in modern Greek, in Ancient Greek, koitazo meant “to lie (eg, in bed)” or “to lie down,” as you Bible scholars may know, so this explanation is nonsense.

Even if arsenokoitis did not mean homosexual, there are other passages, such as in Romans 1, that clearly show the early Christians condemned the practice.

Nonetheless, there are many places in the Western world where it is now considered illegal for pastors to preach from those parts of the Bible that condemn homosexual behavior, and this misinterpretation of arsenokoitis is one of the reasons for that ban.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Global warming takes hit / Take action on DOD pro-homo policy

February 4th, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Climate change, Gay agenda, Homosexual Agenda, science 3 Comments »

Action item: DOD awards homosexuals coveted “victim” status

Don Hank

A friend sent me this email this am, along with the link at the bottom:

“Go to the Chairman of the Joint Chief’s website and blast him as did I. Can’t let the homos and their apologists get ahead of us on the blog there. Encourage others on your list serve.”

There is a lot to tell here. First, I can’t get to the below-linked site or even to my own site Laigle’s Forum (http://laiglesforum.com) with my msn / Internet Explorer combo, and some of my friends can’t either with their servers. There is definitely some hanky-pank going on! (Anyone else notice this with your server?)  I finally got on by using Mozilla Firefox, which I strongly recommend using — especially if you can’t open the link below. My post at the DOD site (if it gets approved):

I have a military friend in the UK who knows what it is like to serve with openly homosexuals in the military. His experience is that the homosexuals are promoted ahead of heteros and then they in turn promote those who will go along with their proclivities and serve as playmates. Heteros not only take a back seat in promotions but, more importantly, are harassed.
The military is not supposed to be for sex games, but you are letting political correctness change that perspective.
Now that America has fallen into the moral irrelevance of Rome, there is no longer a major moral high ground in the world, no moral authority and leadership. Our “men in uniform” are by no means any longer defending a clear-cut moral example for the world to follow. Any nation with a smidgen of morality can defeat us in the propaganda arena and – I don’t say this lightly –  deserves to.

Under this president, and with this weak-kneed military “leadership,” we are  no longer by any means unambiguously the good guys.

We need no longer worry about losing wars. We need to worry about winning them.
http://www.dodlive.mil/index.php/2010/02/chairmans-corner-my-view-on-don’t-ask-don’t-tell/comment-page-1/#comment-1505

Dutch officials enraged at new blunder in climate report

By Don Hank

The global warming myth took another major hit recently.

Here is my partial translation of an article appearing in Volkskrant this morning:

According to the IPCC (International Climate Panel) report of 2007, Holland is 55% under sea level and 65% of the GDP is earned in that area.

The data are wrong, according to figures from the Central Bureau of Statistics [in Holland], which contacted the weekly periodical Vrij Nederland (Free Netherlands). According to the CBS, only one-fifth of the Netherlands lies under sea level and about 19% of GDP is earned there.

“I am very incensed,” says Environment Minister Cramer. “And I will not accept any more errors.” The sea level flap follows earlier revelations that figures on the melting of the glaciers in the Himalayas are wrong and probably based on an informal estimate of the World Wildlife Fund.

The Volkskrant is a Dutch center-left mainstream newspaper. I was unable to find an English language source for this information:

http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/article1345331.ece/Politici_woedend_op_klimaatpanel

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Glenn Beck and how Americans got the way we are

January 10th, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Child abuse, Children & Youth, Christian, Constitution, Culture, Divorce, Drug abuse, Education, Family, Fatherhood, Gay agenda, Gender, Political Correctness, abortion 25 Comments »

Glenn Beck and how Americans got this way

By Don Hank

Recently, a lot has been written about Glenn Beck and his refusal to look at the eligibility issue and his disdain for those of us who care about it.

First, let me be clear: I am a birther. By that I don’t mean that I am claiming Obama was definitely born in Kenya (where they have erected a monument at the place where he was born). I mean that I don’t know if Obama is a natural born citizen because he has never proven it. Therefore Beck is remiss to dismiss birthers’ concerns. We have a constitutional right to know, and judges who say otherwise are derelict in their duties and don’t deserve to be called judges any more than those judges who in 1973 decided that humans in the womb aren’t humans.

Ironically, though, despite Beck’s vexing unwillingness to admit what an increasing number of Americans know or sense about Obama’s eligibility to be president, no one has taught to the broad masses the sources of Marxist brainwashing – how we got to where we are – better than Glenn Beck. Others have written books that changed the way scholarly conservatives think, but Beck popularized this knowledge in ways that made scholars of ordinary people. He went into detail on the origins of “progressivism” and that is important. Without a comprehensive knowledge of how millions of ordinary decent Americans have been turned into glassy-eyed liberals, we are easy prey both to the propaganda itself and to those who accuse us watchdogs of McCarthyism.

Even if you are put off by Glenn’s histrionics, his shows have been a classroom for a long time – especially his TV show, where he has reviewed important eye-opening books night after night. He did his homework. If Patriots view Beck with a jaundiced eye today it is partly because he fails to see the importance of the eligibility issue but also in part because they have underestimated the role of propagandists in turning America leftward and they fail to see how much Beck has pulled back the curtain for millions of us, providing us a glimpse into the sordid world of Marxist disinformation in which we find ourselves.

Further, without Beck, there would not have been the Washington tea party. Like him or hate him, Beck has changed the nation.

This is as good an opportunity as any for a quick review of how we got where we are today, and we can start with a video of an interview with ex-KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov, who shows how Americans were brainwashed through KGB methods such as demoralization and manipulation of and by the media. One thing that sticks in my mind from Yuri’s talks is that people brainwashed by these methods refuse to believe the truth and are essentially dead to the truth. “These people cannot be changed by logic. The change is complete and irreversible,” as Yuri puts it.

Remember the last time you tried to debate with a “liberal” zombie? The change that zombie underwent at some time in his life was complete and irreversible, wasn’t it? Facts are irrelevant.

Only a nucleus of people who read history, keep up with talk radio and web sites like Laigle’s Forum have even a pinch of understanding of what is going on around us and why. The average American will look you in the eye and tell you with a straight face that our “liberalization” is a result of a natural evolution process. We just keep getting smarter and more sensitive to the needs of others. Praise be to Darwin!

The Soviet propaganda source laid bare in the above-linked video is only one of many. Our education system, as Yuri mentions, has undermined us almost to the point of no return. But the influence came not only from Soviet operatives. Another powerful agency was the Frankfurt School, a group of German Marxists who came to America to escape Hitler and showed their gratitude by teaching their host country to hate its founders, its traditions and its culture. Herbert Marcuse, a famous 60s radical and member of our pseudo-intelligentsia, was a scion of that group. Still another group was the more-or-less home-grown communist agents like Saul Alinsky and Cloward and Piven, who taught other leftists how to manipulate us. Then there were our early educational theorists like John Dewey and his myriad clones. Reaching way back, there were psychologists like Freud and Pavlov, and later the “sexologists” Masters and Johnson who taught that sexual promiscuity is our reason for living. Then there was Dr. Spock who taught us how to spoil kids, and Timothy Leary, who taught spoiled kids how to do drugs. Radical feminists like Andrea Dworkin, pushed for welfare and abortion and aided in breaking up families by redefining “abuse” of women, making it include things as prosaic as “giving your wife the silent treatment,” and hypocritically warned of child abuse while endorsing pedophilia. Thanks to their efforts, the institution of “no-fault divorce” was born, which converted the marriage contract into a worthless piece of paper for millions of husbands, who were often rendered penniless in “family” court in the headlong national effort to “protect women and children.” Similar agents of change were pedophiles like NAMBLA founder Allen Ginsberg, and homosexual activists who introduced and pushed for “gay” marriage to further undermine what was left of the American family. The Liberation Theologists made minorities feel oppressed and helpless and urged them to “strike back” at whites, their “oppressors,” rather than raise themselves out of poverty and ignorance through hard work and study, the only way to raise oneself out of poverty and ignorance. The net effect of these hate mongering racists, working in tandem with the educational left, was to create walls of ignorance, prejudice and hatred that will take decades to tear down. Likewise, the developers of the Delphi method, whether wittingly or unwittingly, made a significant contribution to mind control, manipulating participants to accept ideas – even dangerous ones – by “mainstreaming” them. Finally, as David Kupelian reminds us, Madison Avenue advertisers have contributed mightily to plunging us into a bottomless moral abyss where good is evil and vice-versa. (I’m sure you can think of many more such contributors to the brainwashing of America).

If you look at the sleaze surrounding Obama in his college days you get an idea of who many of the other movers and shakers were in the movement to destroy traditional America and replace it with Marxist utopian ideals.

We find that almost all of the ideas promulgated by these “agents of change” are now chillingly mainstream or close to it. Likewise you will find very few liberals who care that the White House resident has communists among his czars or his past mentors. In the ghetto, you’ll find almost no one who objects.

The Dems have them firmly in place down on their plantation.

So where does this leave Glenn Beck?

If I had Glenn Beck in front of me I would say:

You have focused bravely on monumental issues and I admire you for it. In the final analysis, every single one of these issues – from socialist health care to welfare for rich bankers – stems from the unwillingness of American politicians and judges to honor the Constitution. But the Constitution also has rules governing who can be president and who can’t.

I am therefore asking you to focus fairly on the eligibility issue. Give it its just due and please respect truth seekers whose quest has taken them down other trails than yours. They are your potential allies and you can win them back with a little extra effort.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Does Trump only pick on women?

April 22nd, 2009 LAIGLESFORUM Posted in Culture, Culture Wars, Gay agenda, Homosexual Agenda 6 Comments »

Most of you probably know that a judge in Donald Trump’s Miss USA pageant called one of the most promising contestants a foul word and drew a pornographic picture of her just because she does not share his warped leftist views about marriage.

But how many of you have associated that with the bully Trump on his TV show where he fires trembling helpless ladies with such apparent pleasure?

I wrote the following letter to Donald Trump. I asked him if he has the courage to fire a male.

If you also have misgivings about the way this yound lady was treated, won’t you take the time to write to Donald Trump? He does not accept emails, but this time, I figure writing a snail mail is worth the effort.

April 22, 2009

Mr. Donald Trump / 725 5th Ave. / New York, NY 10022

Dear Mr. Trump,

By now you will have heard from a number of Americans who are wondering how the Miss USA pageant could have possibly degenerated to the extent it has just recently, with your judge Perez Hilton calling one of the most popular and promising beauty queens a foul name and drawing a pornographic picture of her, all because she – like you, I am sure – believes in traditional marriage.

We know that you pride yourself in showing class. Yet it seems you have hired a man with so little class it seems hardly appropriate to say “no class,” or even “low class” when describing him. His kind of behavior is so putrid and repugnant it is off the charts. The behavior of animals in the barnyard is a cut better.

Please tell me you didn’t know he was this kind of slime before you allowed him to be a judge in this event. If I thought you did, I wouldn’t bother wasting my time writing you.

On the campaign trail, Barack Obama has said he too believes marriage is between a man and a woman. I wonder if Hilton has an equally low opinion of Mr. Obama. Or does he only pick on helpless women?

My readers and I would be really interested in what you think and would appreciate more than just a boiler plate response. Do you think people who believe in traditional marriage need to take a back seat on the bus? Are atheism and leftist ideals a requisite to being a Miss USA these days?

Americans have seen you many times on TV looking a scared little girl in the eye and shattering her dreams by thundering the words “you’re fired.” Bravo! I’m sure that took tremendous courage for a powerful billionaire like yourself. I now challenge you to show equal courage in dealing with a low-life, foul-mouthed, slithering slimeball male who gets his thrills by attacking helpless females simply for standing up for decency.

Mr. Trump, all eyes are on you now. Screw up your courage again and say what you need to say: Perez Hilton, you’re fired!

Or do you only pick on ladies?

Sincerely,

Don Hank

Editor-in-Chief

Laigle’s Forum

http://laiglesforum.com

AddThis Social Bookmark Button