Laigle’s Forum

by Don Hank

The Fabian Society has vowed to destroy Christianity and impose socialism on the world.

Tony Blair, Bush’s closest ally, is a member of this society. Yet how many know that? Why don’t the media mention it?

The answer is that they are complicit. They too have an interest in eliminating Christianity and imposing socialism. Their fanatical support for Obama makes that clear.

Yet, they method they have chosen, granting ”asylum” to millions of Muslims and letting them take over whole city precincts all over Europe, is dangerous, even for them.

If the Muslims succeed in their plan to take over the West, it is hard to imagine them sharing power with atheist humanists. Their bed is cozy now, but that cannot last given the disparate nature of these bed fellows.

Given the statements of the Imam quoted below, my money is on them. But the Left have the guns so there will be a dust-up, quite a big one.

And then what, lefties?

You thought the Judeo-Christian God was bad? Prepare to meet thy Alllah!

 [The article shown below was sent directly by the author and forwarded. At the time of this writing, it is not available on the internet—DH]

The Time To Decide……………….
 
Guy Leven-Torres
 
29th August 2010
 
Watch the video above first then read these quotes I have given below.
 
 
‘WASHINGTON — Nearly a decade after 9/11, less than a third of the country feels favorably toward Islam. Most Americans reflexively oppose an Islamic cultural center near ground zero, and the lower the Christian president’s approval ratings, the higher the percentage of people who think he’s Muslim.
Why?’

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/08/27/99769/why-are-so-many-americans-hostile.html#storylink=omni_popular#ixzz0xyZPswfK
 
Then read this quote from an Imam I talked to in Slough five years ago…
 
‘British and Europeans must accept Islam-It is the will of Allah. Those that oppose the ummah are disobeying Allah’s will. They will burn in hell. No resistance can be tolerated! We are tomorrow and your future. Islam will and must dominate- Only complete submission will bring our mercy. The UK and Europe must become part of the House of Islam- There is no choice accept it or perish! It is quite simple to understand surely? Most of the elite know this, so why can you not? Christianity and Britain is dead. Nobody goes to Church anymore, your women are a disgrace and young men filthy mouthed louts, you population demoralised and decadent and failing to reproduce itself and marriage is a thing of the past-Only Islam and Sharia will solve the problem-accept what we offer you- to quote a Science fiction series- ‘Resistance is futile’ -
Allah has spoken.
 
Unlike decadent dying Britain, Islam is strong- we support the family and cherish our children. Our women are passive and compliant and decently covered. Your women are whores and utterly selfish. We have large families too-much larger than yours. Our children have purpose- yours are adrift….We will win because of these factors! We are also well organised, committed and prepared to defend ourselves if necessary…. You simply cannot win!‘
 
What I have tried to do above is show you all an encapsulation of the dilemma we face. As things are today, the Imam is correct in his predictions. He is known to me and although we do not see eye to eye, I have had many enjoyable discussions with him. I watched the video of the Bradford EDL march yesterday, including the deliberately staged smoke bombs and UAF infiltrators dressed in face masks and hoods rioting dressed in EDL finery. The UAF is a well organised, state sponsored and trained army of thugs. Its role is to act like the old Nazi Sturm Abteilung or ‘SA’. The UAF was taken over by Moslems some years ago and is now the main fron for jihad in the UK. It has connection with all the extremist groups involved in jihad, including receiving funding from Arab and Pakistani ‘charities’ that are little more than fronts for Islamism and the likes of the Moslem Brotherhood. The UAF is also closely linked to other European ‘Antifas’ in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Germany, France, Holland and elsewhere and also similarly infiltrated if not funded, run, organised and trained by Islamists and their Leftwing Marxoid thugs totally dedicated to the extinction of Capitalism in the EU and its replacement by a Soviet or Islamic State. The elite play a dangerous game, having used these dangerous forces to enforce the EU European state agenda and crush all nationalist resistance. One of their methods like their Hitlerian predecessors (also Socialist) was to create suitable events to demonise their enemies by adopting such methods. In 1939, Hitler ordered German soldiers to dress in Polish uniforms and use  Polish weapons to raid a German radio station on the border to create an excuse to invade in 1939.
 
I believe we are headed for civil war……

by Don Hank

Help grow my megachurch or leave!

I was recently surprised to read that Rick Warren is calling other Christians fake and calling for phony Christians to leave his church. He is targeting in particular those who fail to help his multimillion dollar Saddleback megachurch grow. Is the narrow way passé for the finger-pointing pastor?

A country preacher at a church I once attended used to say “when you point the finger of blame you have three fingers pointing right back at you.”

How about a pastor helping a Marxist get elected?

How about a pastor being unequally yoked with non-believers who deny Christ? Wouldn’t that be fake Christianity? Rick has been yoked with the Left and Islam for some time now despite Paul’s explicit command: 

“Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? And what communion hath light with darkness?” (2 Cor. 6:14).

Rick seems to have his own personal definition of “Christianity” and it doesn’t look quite the same as the Apostle Paul’s.

So who’s a fake? 

Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye. (Matt. 7:5).

The “Christian” Left, hordes of sheep-like socialist heretics led by charismatic fanatics, almost completely took over Europe at various times in the 13th and 14th centuries. Even after they were largely subdued, they clung to their utopian fantasies and the last one of their line, Wilhelm Weitling, met and influenced Karl Marx. Charismatic leaders like Dolcino in Italy and Thomas Müntzer in Germany, condemned other Christians as fakes, preaching that all property must be held in common and strictly forbidding all private ownership of anything. They plundered, killed, maimed, destroyed and looted churches and waged war against all who stood in their way, conquering vast territories and forcing concessions from powerful princes and popes before finally being overthrown. They were convinced that they were right, based on a cursory knowledge of certain verses of the Bible, and that they were Christ’s avengers, based on nocturnal dreams.

Yet nowhere do we read that Jesus or the early Christians had urged Christ’s followers to force others to live by their rules.

Jesus flatly rejected the socialists of his day, in so many words telling them to get lost when they dunned Him to initiate a free lunch program.

The socialist heretics had their way in Europe sporadically for about 2 centuries, and then faded away. Their modern day counterparts will do likewise.

But not before causing untold hardship and leading hordes of foolish, gullible souls to perdition.

Further reading:

http://www.zimbio.com/Rick+Warren+and+Seeker+Sensitive/articles/72/James+Sundquist+statement+Rick+Warrens+invitation

http://www.amazon.com/Whos-Driving-Purpose-Driven-Church/dp/0974476455

Remember when it was little guys who robbed banks?

By Don Hank

Remember when little guys robbed banks? Well, now big crooked bankers rob us, thanks to the crooks we put in office.

Alternet recently ran an amazing article on the ten most corrupt capitalists. I take issue with the use of the word “capitalists” to refer to people whose behavior is best described by the term “fascist” or, as my UK friends politely say, “corporatist.”

But the point is, as a quick scan of that column shows, if you want to get rich through corruption, the winning formula is to be an investor who is well connected to government officials. The popular bank bailouts, started under G.W. Bush and pursued enthusiastically by the Obama administration, are the quintessence of the concept. The idea is to hit up the taxpayer to make your banking buds richer. Of course, no kickbacks ever occur, because crooked politicians wouldn’t stoop that low.

Most of us are vaguely aware that this phenomenon of government-private partnering as part of a get-rich scheme is not just happening in America. It is all the rage in Europe as well, and the following illustrates to just what extent.

Previously, we had run a German language column (no translation yet) at Laigle’s Forum exposing a giveaway of hard-earned EU taxpayer money to millionaire investors in Panama under the wafer-thin guise of “carbon credits.” I sent the column to a number of outlets and a Swiss publisher asked for permission to reprint it there. Briefly, the column shows that the investors received the cash because they planned to build a hydroelectric plant instead of a coal-fired power plant.

What’s wrong with that, you say?

Two things come to mind:

1—There never have been nor ever will be coal-fired power plants in Panama. Thanks to the country’s rich water resources, rivers brimming with enormous flows and lakes to back them up, anyone proposing the construction of a coal-fired plant would become laughingstock immediately. Therefore, the incentive is not an incentive.

2—The same people who want to give the “carbon credits” to Panama for not proposing a coal-fired plant are keen on distributing “carbon credit” wealth to the Tata company to build a coal-fired plant in Gujarat, India under the paper thin pretext that this plant is more efficient than ordinary coal-fired plants.

In other words, there is always an excuse to rob from the poor to give to the rich. The governments of 2 continents saw how readily we swallowed the warnings that the banks would all collapse without a bailout, and now the sky’s the limit.

Now here comes an even taller tale of poor-to-rich wealth redistribution — but a true one (sorry, I was unable to find an English language report on the web).

The report comes from a small conservative blog but is backed up by facts from German radio/TV giant ARD and the widely read mainstream German daily Welt, and my translation follows:

Banker profits most from bailout?

The billionaire rakes in an additional 12 billion from the billion euro grab in Germany. He’s friends with EU Chief Commissioner Jose Manuel Barroso. Get the picture?

Naturally, the report by the ARD didn’t come out until after mental pygmies in the Bundestag (German Lower House) agreed to the package.

According to the report, the billionaire gets an additional 12 billion euros because ordinary Germans are being forced by greedy hands with long arms and fingers reaching into the multi-billion euro grab bag shoveled in by the Bundestag.  Is it insane to wonder whether money is being transferred to certain parties in Germany from these 12 billion extra euros that the billionaire will rake in? Are we out of our minds to think about a secret ugly but juicy kick-back?

The ARD web site explains the European Central Bank (EU) is buying Greek government junk bonds and that Spiro Latsis, Greece’s most powerful banker, is the chief beneficiary. He owned the government bonds, which fell to a value of zero until the EU bought them back from him at face value. Latsis is a personal friend of EU Commission Chief Barroso, who is one of the decision makers in the bailout process. The conflict of interests is obvious, and the ordinary Europeans who paid the bill now know the story.

Once they have taken our last dime, we may all finally figure things out.

Just don’t expect to get your money back.

Laigle’s staff writer Anthony Horvath had an article published with Worldnetdaily.com answering in the affirmative.

Can it really be said, though, that all taxation represents a reduction in freedom? The answer to this must be yes, even if we recognize that the effect on freedom might be slight in some cases. To illustrate, imagine a small income tax of a dollar. It might be an easy matter to get by without that dollar, but it is still one more dollar that you cannot spend according to your own priorities. Consider what the impact is if instead the tax is 25 percent of your income!

We also have to ask about those who are doing the taxing. They obviously believe they have the right to take your resources from you. They must believe that they can obtain some good that you, and perhaps few others, would have subsidized if left to your own devices. They must believe that they know how much they can fairly extract from you. They must believe that they have the right, if you protest, to incarcerate you and take your possessions by force if need be. In sum, they are almost indistinguishable from tyrants.

Christians should not support tyrants or adopt their methods and so become tyrants ourselves. If there is a cause we wish to support, we ought to do so from our own resources out of the free expression of our own hearts (2 Corinthians 8).

Read the rest of the article.

Anthony Horvath is a staff writer for Laigle’s Forum, the Executive Director of Athanatos Christian Ministries, and the author of three books, two in the Birth Pangs series and a pro-life book called We Chose Life.

---

The Cloward-Piven Strategy is a deliberate series of tactics designed to bring a system down in collapse so that a preferred system can be erected in its place.   Named after two Columbia University professors, it was actually employed in the early 1970s.  I want to repeat that:  it was actually employed.

This is not your ordinary conspiracy theory.  In this case, we know that the strategy was employed and had some effect.  Namely, by deliberately burdening New York city’s welfare system, they managed to bankrupt the city, which so declared in 1975.

Cloward and Piven, therefore, have made it impossible to take at face value measures which are put forward as being ‘for the poor,’ especially when those plans emerge from people associated with them or their organizations.

Cloward taught at Columbia University for almost five decades.  During his tenure, a certain Obama attended.  Did Obama and Cloward ever interact?  Did Obama ever take any of Cloward’s courses?  No one can prove he didn’t because Obama refuses to allow Columbia to release his transcripts.   In 1982, Piven returned to New York.  Did Obama interact with these two individuals? Read the rest of this entry »