Hopeless, desperate situation of German women: first hand account of attack on female commuter

Hopeless and desperate situation for German women:

Unreported terror attack on a helpless woman on commuter train in Germany


I got this email this a.m. in German. This kind of account will never find its way into the media. As soon as I read this, I immediately emailed the lady who wrote it. My friend had failed to delete her address. She confirmed that it had indeed happened as related in her email but asked me not to include her address because she is a business woman — implication: I could lose my job for being a victim. 

Of course I complied.

But herein lies the dilemma that is destroying our Western world. If you cannot report things to the press because you know they won’t print them or because you could lose your job, or if you can only report anonymously to a few friends, then there can never be a resolution (remember that rape victims once faced this dilemma). Things will inexorably get worse. As you can see from this email, the situation for women is already desperate and yet they have no mouthpiece, no source of protection. I can’t help but think of the adjective “Kafkaesque.” Franz Kafka, a German speaking Jew living in Prague, described horrific surreal situations and events happening to ordinary people. Though Kafka died before Hitler rose to power, critics generally believe he was foreshadowing the horrors of the Holocaust, conveying the impressions of it in the form of dreams. During my language study in Marburg I was privileged to sit under a professor who specialized in Kafka. Here is my translation of a short Kafka poem to give you a sense of the helplessness and the pathos he often conveys: http://laiglesforum.com/night-time-by-franz-kafka/1385.htm. I see all of my readers and myself as this lonely watchman in a land on the cusp of a great tragedy, with no clear-cut hope for a rescue.

Like this anonymous German lady, our only hope is in God.

Don Hank


My translation of the Report:

 Not so great….

what I experienced in the stations and on the train today.

… today I experienced a terrible attack by an invader who had just arrived in Germany. (I could tell by the bags and the appended Flight Dispatch papers.) The man insulted me in the worst possible way calling me names such as “witch”, etc. What he said to me in his own language, I did not understood. I found it strange that he knew German swear words representing women!

And I had neither looked at him nor approached him. I realized that these people arrive here already stirred up and full of hatred against us. This does not prevent them, however, from living off of our tax money. Since I was not prepared for such an attack out of the blue, I did not answer, but simply tried to find my way to my track, without looking back. The man continued following me quite a distance at the station and then left off harassing me.

Anyway I realized what will happen if another 70 million Muslims come here to Europe! Oh woe! God help us!

Tonight, on the way back, I was probably the only German woman in the whole train. That was a very strange feeling. Two men sitting in my immediate vicinity fondled their genitals the whole time. It was disgusting. I only observed from the corner of my eye and of course, did not deliberately look their way. The men almost all stared at me, since I was styled extremely smartly and businesslike. I got the impression that my very elegant outfit instilled a little respect.

I became keenly aware that neither my pepper spray nor even my powerful and impact resistant laser-beam flashlight, which I could use to blind or strike someone in an emergency, would not help me in the least. Among the mass of (male !!!!) Muslims, I as a woman can do nothing. One is simply helpless.

However, this situation today has also shown me that I have to prepare for such events, so that I remain capable of acting. I had already been in several difficult situations at stations, but there were never this many Muslims facing me. I have to think about it and pray that I will know how to deal with such situations in the future.


Editor’s comment: Let’s use a little reason and common sense. We know that Russia and the Syrian government are knocking the starch out of ISIS and the US-backed terror group Al-Qaeda. The Russian success has forced the US to act accordingly in Iraq to avoid losing face. So imagine you are a terrorist, defeated and fleeing from one of these countries. Where do you go? Need I even say it? You join the throng of refugees headed for Germany (possibly via Turkey, the Italian island of Lampedusa, or Greece). Today more than ever, with ISIS being slowly defeated in key areas, it is a no-brainer that a very high percentage of battle hardened terrorists are embedded among the “refugees.” If this logic is accurate, then things will get much worse before they get better. IF they get better. The above-describe attack shows that things can hardly get much worse for German women. BTW, can anyone fail to understand Trump’s position on Muslim immigration after reading this anguishing account?

Don Hank


Original German language report:

…nicht so toll….

Was ich heute so auf den Bahnhöfen und im Zug erlebte


…dann hatte ich heute eine schreckliche Attacke eines gerade in der BRD angekommenen Invasors. (Das konnte ich an den Koffern und den anhängenden Flugabfertigungs-Papieren erkennen.) Der Mann hat mich auf das Übelste beschimpft und mich mit allen möglichen Ausdrücken, wie  „Hexe“ usw., tituliert. Was er in seiner Landessprache über mir aussprach, habe ich ja nicht verstanden. Eigenartig empfand ich, dass ihm deutsche Schimpfwörter für Frauen, bekannt waren!

Dabei habe ich ihn weder angesehen noch ihn angesprochen. Mir ist dabei klar geworden, dass diese Leute bereits aufgestachelt und voller Hass gegen uns, hier ankommen. Was sie allerdings nicht hindert, von unserem Steuergeld zu leben. Da ich auf so eine Attacke aus dem Nichts, nicht vorbereitet war, habe ich gar nichts geantwortet, sondern versuchte einfach meinen Weg zu meinem Gleis, weiter zu gehen, ohne mich umzusehen. Der Mann ist mir noch ein ganzes Stück auf dem Bahnhof gefolgt und hat dann von einer weiteren Verfolgung meiner Person, abgelassen.

Auf jeden Fall ist mir klar geworden, was es bedeutet, wenn weitere 70 Mio. Moslems hier nach Europa kommen! Oh weh! Gnade uns Gott!

Heute Abend, auf dem Rückweg, war ich wohl die einzige Deutsche in dem ganzen Zug. Das war ein ganz eigenartiges Gefühl. Zwei Männer, in meiner unmittelbaren Nähe sitzend, haben sich die ganze Zeit an Ihren Geschlechtsteilen selbst gegrabscht. Es war widerlich. Ich habe das nur aus den Augenwinkeln gesehen und natürlich nicht extra dort hin geschaut. Die Männer haben mich fast alle angestarrt, da ich heute extrem schick und geschäftsmäßig gestylt war. Ich hatte den Eindruck, dass ihnen mein sehr elegantes  Outfit ein wenig Respekt eingeflößt hat.

Mir ist heute so richtig klar geworden, dass weder mein Pfefferspray, noch meine große und schlagfeste Laserstrahl – Taschenlampe, mit der ich blenden und im Notfall auch zuschlagen könnte, mir etwas nützen würde. Bei der Masse von (männlichen!!!!) Moslems, kann ich als Frau nichts mehr tun. Man ist einfach hilflos.

Diese Situation heute, hat mir aber auch gezeigt, dass ich mich auf solche Begebenheiten vorbereiten muss, damit ich handlungsfähig bleibe. Ich war ja schon mehrmals in schwierigen Situationen auf den Bahnhöfen, aber da waren es auch noch nicht so viel Moslems, denen ich gegenüber stand. Ich muss noch darüber nachdenken und auch beten, damit ich weiß, wie ich mit solchen Situationen in Zukunft, umzugehen habe.



Film on Saudi brutality corroborates my warnings

The new video Saudi Arabia Uncovered is an expose of the brutal torture and murders occurring almost daily in the Saudi kingdom and the Western acceptance of this evil.

I have said before that the US government has shaped its foreign policy around Saudi interests — in order to keep the Saudis happy enough to keep propping up the US dollar by charging only USD for their oil. As a result, the Pentagon has reduced our brave young men to mercenaries for the Saudis and the State Department has adopted stealthy policies (eg, the refusal of the Pentagon to target ISIS in Syria in a serious and purposeful way) that make the US a virtual missionary for the cruel, intolerant religion of Wahhabism, which fuels all major anti-Christian terror groups, including Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra (supported as “rebels” in Syria thru US arms and money, thanks in large part to the treachery of John McCain) and ISIS.

In March of 2015, I wrote here about the US-Saudi petrodollar agreement, a taboo topic, and have shown in a translation and associated commentary here how the West is still very actively supporting Saudi-propagated terror.  Very little is written about the Kissinger-Faisal petrodollar agreement mentioned in my article of March 2015. Thus, I tried a search with the terms “text of petrodollar agreement us saudi” and found no text (Note: I am not referring to an economic agreement signed with the Saudis around the same time, which is published but does not mention US military obligations to the Saudis). This is not surprising. The Saudis are very secretive about virtually everything they do, especially about their agreements with the West. Perhaps we can look forward to the disclosure of such a text by Wikeleaks or the like. The reason given by the Saudis for this secrecy is that they do not want Arabs to learn that they are cooperating with the West. However, a more likely reason is that the US government does not dare let its people find out the dirty and immoral dealings it has with the Saudis (including clandestine arms shipments to Wahhabi terror groups) just to preserve the dollar – dealings that threaten not only Middle Eastern and European stability but civilization itself.
After all, readers might infer – rightfully – that the US is in fact a puppet of the Saudi royals and is behind all the terror organizations that it pretends to oppose. As Pogo famously said, “we have met the enemy and he is us.”

The West uses a vague reference to “shared intelligence” as an excuse for their support of the Saudis. Western leaders, mostly British, are quoted in the film repeating the mantra that they receive “valuable intelligence” from the Saudi government, as if this vague assistance could justify aiding and abetting the Saudis in their support of terror groups and the spread of the terrorist ideology of Wahhabism.

The film does, however, suggest that the West’s war in Kosovo (the subject of my recent article here) was apparently waged in order to help the Saudis spread terror and Wahhabism (a Sunni sect) in Europe. It had nothing to do with humanitarian motives. Thus all the brutality depicted in the film is in fact reflected in US foreign and military policy.

I had discussed here how NATO had in fact acted as a Saudi agent in the Kosovo war, and I had shown that candidates like Cruz who support NATO were in fact supporting not American security as they insist but in fact Saudi interests.

A quick analysis of all US-waged wars outside the Americas for the last roughly 45 years since the signing of the petrodollar agreement between Kissinger and King Faisal (no one seems to know the exact date but we know the time frame) reveals that none of these wars benefited the US in any tangible direct way, but that all of them benefited the Saudis by helping them spread terror and Wahhabism. Despite the obviousness of this observation (for example the fact that the Assyrian Christians started leaving Iraq in droves shortly after we “won” the war in Iraq), very little has been written by anyone besides myself regarding the link between the petrodollar and terror.

The only article I could find on the internet that arrives at a conclusion similar to mine is this one.

US politicians and the msm have been sliming Iran, Syria and the Shiites, and in so doing have given the Sunnis in Saudi Arabia a pass. This film helps set the record straight.

I think it is inevitable that, thanks in part to this film, the sordid Saudi influence on Western foreign policy will now come out bit by bit and serve as a catalyst for a much-needed change in Western foreign and military policy — preferably a 180 degree shift..

The neglected Libyan public

Missing from the jubilant “world opinion” over the brutal murder and torture of the moderate Libyan leader is an analysis of Libyan street opinion. I think I know why no one is talking to them.


Don Hank

It was supposed to be all about the Libyan people. Remember? Yet missing in all the news on the subject of Libya are

1–the reaction of the LIBYAN PEOPLE to the rising specter of Sharia law. (Wasn’t it they whom we so bravely bombed residential areas to “save”?). They have had 40 years of a moderate Western-style judiciary. But they were lured by Western propaganda to seek “democracy” by overthrowing their moderate leader. The narrative was that they would be free, with a strong suggestion that Western style democracy was on the way. Now some are certainly already seeing that their new unelected Sharia law-advocating “leader,” the favorite of the Western Colonial Empire, is far from the freedom they expected.

2–an analysis (poll) of Libyan street opinion on the murder of Ghadaffi. All of a sudden, journalists supportive of “democracy” are oblivious to public opinion. But we’re used to that now, what with bailouts being decided far above our heads and reporters giving our objections short shrift. It’s only our money, after all.

The incontrovertible fact is that enough people in various cities supported Ghadaffi with their lives to prolong the war beyond expectations. Yet the press wants you to believe hatred for Ghadaffi and support for the new radical Islamist government are virtually universal.

Reported are only reactions of world leaders and the new government, i.e., influential elites who have no interest in how the people are treated but everything to gain financially and politically by playing along with the Western Ruling Class — aloof imperial strong men who hypocritically and absurdly supported the illegal torture and murder of prisoner of war Ghadaffi on “humane” grounds — but pretended to care about human rights long enough to take out this moderate leader and replace him with a radical who staunchly defends the lopping off of body parts and stoning as punishment for crimes and even sexual indiscretions. Welcome to democracy, Libya!

Virtually every Western “leader” supported the brutal torture and murder with gleeful words, even laughter or complicit silence.

It is reminiscent of how the US unilaterally instigated a coup in Iran to oust the “tyrannical” Shah only to see him replaced by a tyrant 10 times more heinous and cruel. Or for that matter, how they instigated a coup in Egypt to topple the “tyrant” Mubarek, who in fact was the most Western-friendly stabilizing factor in the region, only to replace him with an unelected military government that raided a Coptic Christian monastery the day they assumed power, wasting no time in stripping off their masks.

How deceitful our elites. How utterly gullible their subjects!

Will we ever learn?

Actually, we always do. After it is too late, like right now!

Read: http://www.medialens.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=1&Itemid=8

Just as I told you: Sharia law coming to Libya

You can’t say I didn’t warn you: Libya’s new leader wants sharia law.


Don Hank

Newsmax just now reported that the new unelected leader of Libya is a strong proponent of Sharia law – in contradistinction to the moderate Ghadaffi whom we just murdered.

Mustafa Abdul-Jalil, the favorite of NATO, the EU, David Cameron, Nicolas Sarkozy and most other European leaders, as well as of Obama, “laid out a vision for the post-Gadhafi future with an Islamist tint, saying Islamic Sharia law would be the ‘basic source’ of legislation and existing laws that contradict the teachings of Islam would be nullified.”

Why was this no surprise to me?

I had just recently researched Mustafa Abdul Jalil’s background and learned :

After graduating from the department of Shari’a and Law in the Arabic Language and Islamic Studies faculty of University of Libya in 1975, Abdul Jalil was initially “assistant to the Secretary of the Public Prosecutor” in Bayda, before being appointed a judge in 1978.[6]
Abdul Jalil was a judge “known for ruling consistently against the regime,…”

 I had looked this up in response to naïve comments from a reader who has the misfortune to be addicted to the MSM and apparently has not yet seen the extent to which modern “journalists” are in fact propagandists and little else.

This reader quoted a prediction that if the war were to continue, a half-million Libyans would die.

I read the article this reader linked to and was astonished to find the quote was attributed to none other than the leader of the transition government, Mustafa Abdul Jalil.

So I researched his background and sure enough, he is a proponent of Sharia law.

Now, go ahead and tell me the EU, NATO, Sarkozy and Obama didn’t know this.

We just murdered a man who was a moderate and Western-friendly in order to install a radical Islamist who will rule the same way they rule in Iran and Saudi Arabia. That can only mean the cruelest possible punishments. Just for reference, a Saudi court recently ordered a migrant worker’s eye gouged out.

Ghadaffi had tried Sharia law and found it did not work well in the real world; further, while the Western propaganda bleated that Ghadaffi was a ruthless dictator who swept aside all opposition, he obviously had kept Abdul Jalil alive and in power despite their major differences. If he was so ruthless, why is Abdul Jalil still alive?

OUR money paid for Ghadaffi’s brutal murder. OUR American and British and French blood was spilled to murder a friendly moderate and install a hostile Islamist in Libya.

It is a self-replicating pattern of what was done in Iran, Kosovo, Iraq, Egypt and Ivory Coast: support for rigid, radical Islamists over moderates who tolerated Jews and Christians.

YOUR government did not do it. You do not have a government. You have, in lieu of a legitimate government, a clique of usurpers with superior mind control methods, led by bankers, corporations, media moguls and assorted government agencies and officials in league with each other, who despise you, your values and your Western way of life and, using the language of moderation and tolerance, are stealthily installing leaders in the Middle East to destroy the last traces of Western influence, except for heavily guarded ties to the Western Ruling Class and the banking system (Ghadaffi had made the mistake of establishing an independent Libyan banking system). Nothing has changed since the late 1880s when a small group of rich radicals met at a private home in a banking area of London for the purpose of accomplishing two heinous goals throughout the world: 1) Install socialism, and 2) eliminate Western (particularly Christian) culture. They later took the name “Fabian Society” and are still quite active today, both in the open, and more importantly, under a cloak of secrecy. Mild-mannered Tony Blair is a member.

Things are going swimmingly for them, what with millions of Muslims imported against the will of the people and wars in the Middle East that tend to strangle Christian influence there.

People don’t get it. They say “these leaders must be crazy” and “if only we could make them understand what they are doing to us.”

But they know exactly what they are doing to us. And they are far from crazy. But so far we have been docile little toadies bowing and scraping before them and dutifully taking notes as they instruct us in the most efficient means of self destruction.

That must stop or we are doomed.

Pray for Israel. Pray for the Middle East Christians.

Pray that others will wake up and see the evil shadow government behind the mask and behind weasel words like peace, sustainable development, green energy, wealth redistribution, quantitative easing

The Ruling Elites also speak out of both sides of their mouths on Israel and the Jews, subtly promoting anti-Jewish sentiment eerily reminiscent of Germany in the 30s and 40s, while pretending to honor holocaust victims. As a result of their anti-Jewish whispering campaign, I find that even some of my freedom advocating correspondents in Europe, who properly grasp that the EU is a dictatorship, show decidedly anti-Jewish sentiments, failing to understand that in so doing, they are, tragically, supporting the people they think they are opposing.

The words of Western “leaders” mean just the opposite of what they say and suggest.

Open your eyes.

You can’t fight an invisible enemy, and you can’t survive if you don’t fight back.


I tried to warn you before:











The Fabian society:



I told you so, again

Obama’s Libya:

I don’t mind one bit saying “I told you so” to all those — particularly journalists — who ignored my objective, fact-supported arguments against Western military and foreign policy in the Middle East and wound up with egg on their face as a result. (I have been trying to revive the nearly-lost scientific method and apply it to journalism, which has become nothing but a series of propaganda mills. So far, there seem to be no takers).

Obama and NATO must bear the responsibility for the fall of Kaddafi, and I have warned that this fall of a stable secular Middle Eastern leader will come back to bite the West hard in the butt.

Now Fox News and others are finally cautiously discussing the fact that the rebels are an unknown quantity and may not be as benign as they were portrayed back when they seemed to have much less chance of winning. Last night it was pointed out by Sean Hannity and Oliver North that they are a mix of tribal representatives and terrorists and their new proposed constitution already calls for sharia law, in stark contrast to Kadaffi’s secular constitution (miss him yet?).

Most telling was the remark: “Obama owns Libya.”

In case you have forgotten our direct military involvement in Libya, in addition to Obama’s repeated calls for Kadaffi (sp Gadhaffi in the linked article) to step down, here is the report on the joint French-American Operation Odyssey Dawn the day after it happened:


 Back in March, I found no mainstream commentators on the left or right criticizing the West’s role in this operation or in Egypt. In fact, there has been a steady stream of “conservative” criticism against Obama for not going after Kadaffi more resolutely. (The clueless candidates — most recently Bachmann — mostly followed their clueless lead, bleating similar statements). Generally, there is a dearth of substantive criticism of any Western military involvement by left or right, no doubt for political or career reasons (many fear appearing unpatriotic, even though honest and objective commentary would ultimately save Western lives and Western embarrassment), but also due to a serious shortage of brain power. Now that a Marxist is in the White House, mainstream conservatives are finally criticizing our involvement in a Middle East conflict, but mainly because they can pin the fallout on the Left. But none of them mentioned that the regimes in post-Carter Iran, post-Clinton Kosovo, post-Bush Iraq, post-rebellion Egypt and the Ivory Coast, once ruled by secularists, are now in the hands of democratically elected Islamist leaders or mobs who openly persecute and murder Christians wholesale  (see, for example, the 4th link below on the Ivory Coast massacre of Christians presided over by the UN) and do not believe in Israel’s right to exist. (A nation that allows Muslims to live within its boundaries, whereas Muslim nations typically forbid Israelis — or often any Jews — even to visit. How fair and democratic is that?).

By contrast, I (who have nothing to lose, am not being paid for this and answer to no one) was warning repeatedly about the error in our involvement in the Middle East, not just by Democrat presidents, notably Obama, but also by Republicans (BTW, Reagan, who pulled us out of Lebanon, was an exception), and pointing out then-unheeded facts to state my case, reminding, for example, that the local Christian populations were always the ones who paid the biggest price when a stable secular leader was replaced by a mob, which eventually, inevitably, turned into an Islamic-led government with significantly less freedom for the people than under the “cruel dictators” we replaced — as well as vastly less diversity, which, oddly, Western powers prize in their countries. Israel, of course, came closer to the brink of war with each successive “win” and Iran was given a permanent pass by the West, as though these merciless enforcers of brutal Sharia law, who execute countless people for sexual misdeeds and inappropriate clothing, were lily-white defenders of human rights (as we speak, there are 2 Americans jailed in Iran for “spying,” on flimsy evidence). I sent links to each of my articles on this subject to thousands of potential readers, including major news outlets, inclucing to all Fox News personalities. News people typically do not respond, but judging by last night’s commentary by Sean, perhaps they had read some of what I said here:












and here



Olavo de Carvalho also warned you here:


Look, I don’t mind people calling me crazy. But you journalists who lead the Western world by providing information to decision makers, should know by now that, in the long run, ignoring warnings about the West’s disastrous involvement in the Middle East is going to hurt you a whole lot more than it does the warning party.

Don Hank


How Western powers abet Christian persecution

Blatantly anti-Christian Western foreign policy: support of anti-Christian dictators, war against Christian supporters 

by Don Hank

Recently, it was reported that Chinese Catholics will defy their government’s ban  on observing the International Day of Prayer.

But how can there be a government ban on this, since prayer is speech, which is, to quote Barack Obama, a “universal right.” Obama said that in a speech warning Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak not to step on the human rights of Egyptian protesters, who were destroying government property and burning cars in the streets.

So what did our courageous White House resident have to say about the blatant human rights violations in China?

Nothing. Neither did any other Western “leader.”

In fact, no president has complained about any human rights violations in China, where Christianity is strictly regulated, and in North Korea, where North Korea, where Christians are reportedly jailed, beaten, executed and, in one case, pulverized with steam rollers, and where Kim Jong Il reportedly starved 2 million people to death.

The official Western response to inhumane dictators is always the same:

1–ignore any human rights violations against Christians anywhere

2–support groups hostile to Christians

As I showed in a previous article, in every conflict involving Muslims, the West’s intervention  has led to the persecution of Christians, and for the most part, has eliminated the indigenous Christian population.  Every single one of our interventions has had this same kind of outcome.

Saddam, though a tyrant,  protected Christians during his reign. Once he was toppled, the persecution of Christians was immediate. The US government under Bush/Obama did nothing and did not protest. The Assyrian Christians there were quietly deported to Sweden, which granted them asylum. Think about it: a country under American control persecuting its Christians with the tacit permission of the Americans (who now go to war to protect “human rights”).

Mubarak held the line as best he could against anti-Christian actions. He didn’t do a great job of it, mind you, but tried his best in view of the anti-Christian atmosphere among the populace. But the day he was forced out of office — under pressure from Obama — the Egyptian military fired on monks and workers at a Coptic monastery.

The Ivory Coast had a Christian president, Laurent Gbagbo, who claimed election fraud in his re-election bid. Indeed, there was strong evidence that there was fraud and that the Muslim candidate who claimed victory had in fact lost on number of votes (as I reported before, I read this in a French paper that had the chutzpah to report it, showing photos of altered ballots). The UN kicked out the Christian and declared the Muslim president without investigating the claims of fraud. In one area under UN control, 1000 Christians were murdered. There was no meaningful protest from any Western powers, which months prior to this had investigated reports of human rights violations by the Christian president.

Next in line is Syria. Obama has drawn a bead on President Basher Assad. Now, you may be wondering about Syria’s record on Christianity. A few years back a Syrian pastor visited our church and told us that, amazingly, Syria, at least at that time, was so Christian-friendly that the government there actually donated construction materials for the building of Christian churches. I believe this was true. The leadership has not changes since then, so we are talking about another Christian-friendly country that may soon fall into the hands of violent, brutal Islamists. No wonder the Christian-hostile Western powers are eager to see Syria fall. God protect the Christians there should that happen!

Anyone who wishes to learn the details of brutal Chinese and N. Korean persecution of Christians can go to sites like Voice of Martyrs and read gut-wrenching horror stories of abuse. Yet what do we do about China? Why we practice “free” trade with them of such magnitude that we destroy Western industry and make them the second richest nation on earth, and Obama fetes Hu Jintao in the White House, even as Chinese dissidents, including Nobel prize winner Liu Xiaobao sit in Chinese prisons for speaking their minds. Apparently, freedom of speech is only a “universal right” in Muslim countries where dissidents seek to topple Christian-friendly governments. Go ahead, tell me I am exaggerating.

Question for the reader:

Does anyone here think the West, which wages war at the drop of a hat over “human rights,” will ever do anything to protect Christians outside the West and do you expect these same Western powers never to persecute Western Christians once they think the coast is clear? 

It is constantly suggested in the media that the purpose of “separation of church and state” is to protect non-Christians from human rights violations by theocratically minded Christians.

But here is what most of us have been lulled into forgetting:

It is one thing — and quite a bad thing — for the government to favor the majority religion over another or set up a theocracy. But it is quite another for a government to promote, through its foreign policies, groups that persecute people of any religion because of their religion.

It is time the West woke up to see what is really going on under our very noses.

It is time we the people took back the West.

In a very real way, we are under a hostile foreign occupation, by a Right-Left coalition of Democrats and GOP in America and by the UN, NATO and the EU in Europe, whose actions consistently run counter to the will of the people. We the people have a sovereign right to our own culture and do not have to be manipulated into abandoning it in favor of a foreign one.

Of course, we also have the right to continue committing national suicide if that is what we really want.

It is up to us.

Does the West have the will to survive?

Since the writing of this article, our friend in Christ Berit Kjos added a link to it at her site. She added some information in a yellow box at the top. Please check it out:


Further reading:

World Day of Prayer banned in China:


Obama to Mubarak (Jan.): “Free speech is a human right.”


Executed in N Korea for not renouncing faith in Christ:


Kim Jong Il starved 2 million to death:


N. Korea inters, beats to death Christians


Christians pulverized with steam rollers in North Korea:


1,000 Christians murdered in Ivory Coast under UN watch:


Western hypocrisy in Muslim conflicts


Scandinavia finally learns — the hard way

Scandinavia has finally had enough

by Don Hank

Scandinavia, having been forced — along with other countries with strong economies — by their EU Rulers to pay  bailouts to irresponsible banks and governments, and having witnessed first-hand the damage done by hordes of hostile Muslim immigrants, has been turning steadily rightward, as shown by a landmark election in 2006.

The Swedish welfare state has been collapsing due in large part to the importation of overwhelming numbers of Muslims who indulge in crimes like rape, and theft that native Swedes have long eschewed.

In one interview, Muslim criminals claimed they enjoyed robbing Swedes because they are wimps who never resist and because they don’t like the way Swedes look at them. Like their counterparts throughout Europe, the Swedes are definitely wimps, no doubts about it.

A Swedish sociology prof says the solution is “jobs for everyone.” In other words, keep importing Muslims who hate you, keep them on the social assistance (welfare) rolls, but for goodness sakes, give the poor things your job. That will solve everything by putting you the Swedes on welfare and letting them pay your way for a change.

If someone broke into his home and raped his wife, I wonder if this sweet professor would offer the rapist-thief a job.

In response, political parties labeled as “ultraright” by the ultraleft (the average university “educated” European professional these days) are surging in Scandinavia.

Just this week, the nationalist, anti-EU True Finns party won dramatic electoral gains, showing that an increasing number of Finns have had enough of bailouts and hostile immigrants rammed down their throats by the tyrannical Brussels bureaucrats-in-chief.

Unfortunately, in the US, the people and their politicians are prioritizing anything but illegal immigration and that spells trouble ahead.

According to Judicial Watch, the Obama administration’s answer to illegal immigration and drug trafficking by Mexicans in the US is to make it impossible for the Border Patrol to interfere with their “business”!

It is tragic that so few seem to care.

But like Europe, we may have to learn this lesson the hard way.

This week’s Finnish right turn:


Swedish crisis:


US “solution” to drug smuggling:


Sweden’s right turn:


Akhtar Hussain, thank you for making the right choice

I am grateful. Your choice left no grieving widows or orphans that night.

by Don Hank

My Muslim friend Mahmoud sent me an email with an attachment regarding a Pakistani man, Akhtar Hussain, who burned a Bible at a church in Pakistan as a protest against the Koran burning by Terry Jones. The desecrator was arrested and charged with a crime that carries a sentence of up to 10 years.

Mahmoud said that the Bible is a holy book in the Muslim world as well, is himself incensed by this act and is interested in my reaction. Ok.

First I wish I had Mr. Hussain before me. I would like to thank him for making the right choice.

Hear me out, please.

The Christian Post reported the reaction of world Christendom to the Bible burning. It was the usual bland politically correct pabulum, uttered for the consumption of their constituents: “we condemn this act of desecration…”

It was utter hypocrisy, because these clergy desecrate the scriptures constantly by distorting the Word of God every chance they get.

World “Christendom” today is increasingly tolerant of the most crass and outrageous desecration of the scriptures by the clergy. Every Sunday from the pulpit and in their weekday communications with the secular world, “Christian” pastors routinely distort the Word of God, blasphemously declaring that God accepts homosexual marriage and homosexual priests and pastors. They constantly desecrate the legitimacy of government, at variance with the exhortations of Jesus and the Apostle Paul. Jesus said to give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. Paul said the authorities are given their power by God.

Yet most denominations today illegitimately strip the Constitution and the will of the people (in whom governing power is vested) of their authority by endorsing illegal immigration and providing sanctuaries for law breakers.

Many pastors also substitute godless socialism for the legitimate gospel of Jesus Christ, trampling on the “bread of life” doctrine and elevating the doctrine of material bread high above it.

Still others, while claiming to represent conservative Christians, support leftist dogma or godless far-left candidates.

Muslims love it when Christian leaders condemn people for doing what Akhtar Hussain did. And they love it when we say “people like that belong in jail.” It brings them closer to their goal of having the West make laws that protect holy books, at variance with the Constitution and the Magna Carta.

They are hoping that softheaded American Christians will get behind a new bill that may be proposed shortly by the Democrats and one GOP jackass, Lindsay Graham (have you see the video? He really is one), and that is, a bill that would outlaw desecrating the Koran. Now, mind you, the US military burned 2500 Bibles in Afghanistan that were the private property of military personnel, and that is fine with the clergy. Not one Christian leader said “we condemn this act of desecration.” And, while Christian leaders condemn (they seem to savor that word) Terry Jones for sullying a false religion that honors murderers, not one of them objects to the new proposed freedom-crushing legislation.

But what should be done to Akhtar Hussain, you ask?

Well, what would Jesus do?

When Jesus was being murdered, He cried out to His Father: Forgive them for they know not what they do.

Mr. Hussain is a Muslim. For him, the Bible is not holy. For some Muslims it is, but not for all. For him it is not a holy book.

He has not read the Bible and doesn’t know about the saving power and grace of Jesus’ blood.

If the ones who killed Jesus were to be forgiven for their ignorance (even without asking forgiveness), don’t you think Mr. Hussain will be forgiven for his ignorance of the life-giving message of salvation?

I don’t know the answer to that question. If they were Christian clergy desecrating the Word, as is their wont, then there could be no forgiveness, because they know the Word and they know what God expects, and they desecrate the Word in spite of it. So don’t be surprised at how few preachers and priests you see in heaven.

But Hussain probably doesn’t know any of this.

One thing is certain: Hussain’s punishment is not a question for men to decide. God will decide the issue when Mr. Hussain comes before Him at the Seat of Judgment.

When men try to judge people on religious matters and create “religious crimes,” as the Pakistani legislature has, and as Lindsay Jackass Graham and his fellow jackasses on the other side of the aisle want to do in our country, then God is displeased because they are doing what the crowd was doing when they tried to stone the adulteress. Because this is not our domain.

Here is what I say to Akhtar Hussain:

As a Christian, I am saddened that you burned the Bible, but that act proved you don’t understand the Bible. To understand it is to love it, unless you belong to Satan.

But then, for you, given your upbringing, and given what Terry Jones did to a book that you consider holy (wrongfully so), you had a choice. You could have taken a human life or you could have burned that Bible, as you did.

As a result of your choice, there were no grieving widows or orphans that night, just a little pile of ashes and a minuscule quantity of carbon added to the atmosphere of your fair city. God was sad, but He knows your fate and perhaps He is waiting for you to make another choice now.

That’s all you did, and it could lead to something really wonderful. My fingers are crossed.

Not only that, your choice gave Christians all over the world the opportunity to witness to Muslims like you, and, not counting the stupidity of our clergy, we did it by our restraint and tolerance.

Not one Christian anywhere in the world harmed a Muslim over this act of yours. It was not a Christian but a Muslim policeman who placed you under arrest and it will be a Muslim judge to sentence you.

The entire Muslim world can see the contrast between Pakistan’s harsh Sharia law and the angry murderers in Afghanistan and Iraq on the one hand and, on the other, the shining example set by forgiving Christians, who, rather than speak ill of you, pray for you sincerely and wish you the best. I join them tonight in praying that you will find Jesus and that God will bring you great peace, joy, prosperity and happiness.

I also sincerely pray that the judge will be lenient.

Thank you for making the right choice.

Muslims massacre Christians after getting UN support. Obama and European leaders silent. UN does nothing to stop massacre. The West’s involvement in the Middle East is consistently anti-Christian, pro-Muslim, promotes savagery:


Muslim apologetics and Christian responses

by Don Hank

I had shared with the reader my response to a Muslim whom I debated over the differences between Christianity and Islam.

I had thought it would be worthwhile to some as a template for Christian apologetics with Muslims. I had mentioned some of Mahmoud’s arguments, but had not included his lengthy argument.

Below I share it with the reader, in addition to some further rebuttals to his claims.

It is noteworthy that Mahmoud – like many Muslim intellectuals today – makes no attempt to apologize for the violent acts of his fellow Muslims.

Instead, intriguingly, he uses the Bible as an excuse for such behavior.

I had later left a message for him that must have left him dumbfounded, because he pleaded in the last email “please, no more discussion.”

The Muslim world is used to our wishy-washy responses to their arguments. They are used to dealing with Westerners who know nothing about the Bible and whom they can twist them around their little fingers.

This is why having the ability to defeat them at this game is no small contribution to the continued survival of Western civilization. My victory over Mahmoud was our victory. He knows he can’t proceed to the next level of this debate. He has been defeated both intellectually and morally and will never forget the rebuttals he received from me and my friends. I want to thank all who helped with this debate, especially with the scriptural rebuttals. I could not have done it alone without your, and God’s, help. BTW, I suspect even atheists can appreciate the advantage we have when we arm ourselves with the full armor of God. (And by that I do not mean the wishy-washy social gospel).

A few quick notes here:

It is very true that the Old Testament calls for violent punishments for all sorts of misdemeanors, many of which are no longer considered as such anywhere in the West.

Nor did Jesus say these were to be abolished.

And the Muslims use this lack of direct abolition of the ancient law to show that the Old Testament laws still stand. Which they do, but with a very important proviso.

Jesus did something more important and more poignant than directly stating the Law was abolished. He was not in a political position to say this directly, and He really didn’t want to abolish the law, just the way it was enforced all too often by heinous sinners and hypocrites.  So He taught by example.

For example, the law whereby adultery is to be punished by stoning was indirectly replaced by the concept of grace when Jesus confronted the crowd that was about to stone and adulteress and said:

“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.”

When no one stepped forward, Jesus had masterfully shown that, while God is still displeased with sin, none of us is worthy to administer the punishment. Only God can do that. By extension, this applies to all of the Hebrew laws requiring harsh punishments.

And yet, as if to rebuke the “liberals” of His day and ours, Jesus added, addressing the adulteress:

“Go and sin no more.”

He meant it. So in that sense, the law was not abolished, just as He said it was  not (I am come not to abolish the law but to fulfill the law).

But the Muslims ignore this all-important nuance, and they quote the above claim by Jesus to show triumphantly that the law still stands and that they have the right to mete out harsh punishments by terror and stoning. In fact, they sometimes claim that parts of the Bible have been falsified and that this sort of thing never happened.

Their “Prophet” re-wrote the scriptures to satisfy his own thirst for violence and vengeance and for sexual gratification, and they honor him for it. Nothing could be more evil and diabolical. They even say we are blaspheming when we reject their prophet’s words. They miss the irony of Mohammed blaspheming against Christ by calling Him a mere prophet on a level with Mohammed, denying His position as Master and Savior and denying His crucifixion and resurrection.

As you can see from Mahmoud’s text below, much of what the Muslims believe about Jesus is the same as the Christian creed, except for a few points such as the crucifixion and resurrection, as mentioned above. Yet these nuances make the difference between a medieval society that scarcely functions and a high-powered dynamic society that produces scientific wonders and enables people to live at relative peace.

Finally, the Muslims claim Jesus never said He was God.

I was about to go look for scripture to rebut this, but just as I switched back to my email, a new email came in from a brother in Christ who has been a mentor to me.

Here he writes exactly what I was about to look for (the comments are his):

John 20: 

27 Then He said to Thomas, “Reach here with your finger, and see My hands; and reach here your hand and put it into My side; and do not be unbelieving, but believing.”

 28 Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!”

 29 Jesus said to him, “Because you have seen Me, have you believed? Blessed are they who did not see, and yet believed.”

Note that Jesus did not correct him as He should and would have if it were not true, and He accepted his worship.

John 10

while the casual reading public today might not get the full meaning of what Jesus said here, the rulers sure did.

32 Jesus answered them, “I showed you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you stoning Me?”

33 The Jews answered Him, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; and because You, being a man, make Yourself out to be God.”

Look at what Peter said.

18 And it happened that while He was praying alone, the disciples were with Him, and He questioned them, saying, “Who do the people say that I am?”

 19 They answered and said, “John the Baptist, and others say Elijah; but others, that one of the prophets of old has risen again.”

 20 And He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” And Peter answered and said, “The Christ of God.”

 21 But He warned them and instructed them not to tell this to anyone,

Luke 69

69 “But from now on THE SON OF MAN WILL BE SEATED AT THE RIGHT HAND of the power OF GOD.”

 70 And they all said, “Are You the Son of God, then?” And He said to them, “Yes, I am.”

 71 Then they said, “What further need do we have of testimony? For we have heard it ourselves from His own mouth.”

John 8

57 So the Jews said to Him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?”

 58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am.”

 59 Therefore they picked up stones to throw at Him, but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple.

[Before going into Mahmoud’s arguments, I just happened to have received a link from a sister in Christ that shows how wimpy “Christian” pastors side with Muslims in distorting the scriptures: http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/011/bell.htm

Here is a great patriotic speech on this subject:


—– Original Message —–


To: zoilandon@msn.com

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 1:17 PM

Subject: RE: Blasphemy Laws in Bible


The Islamic view of Jesus lies between two extremes. The Jews , who rejected Jesus as a Prophet of God, called him an impostor. The Christians, on the other hand, considered him to be the son of God and worship him as such.

Islam considers Jesus to be one of the great prophets of God and respects him as much as Ibrahim (Abraham), Moses, and Mohammed. (Peace Be Upon Them) This is conformity with the Islamic view of the oneness of God, the oneness of Divine guidance, and the complementary role of the subsequent mission of God’s messengers.








Now you people are free to apply what you want…! Where we insult the Jesus(pbuh)..? Where we make fun of him…? We Muslims can’t even think like this…!  even in Iran, where you think people can’t have freedom of speech. or in USA, the champion of freedom, we are same every where for the respect of Jesus(pbuh) and Bible(book of God).

From: zoilandon@msn.com
To: Subject: Re: Blasphemy Laws ib Bible
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:16:09 -0500

I asked that because it is my understanding that Jesus is not considered the Savior by Muslims. I didn’t say he wasn’t a prophet. I said Muslims think he is ONLY a prophet and nothing more.

—– Original Message —–

From: xxx To: zoilandon@msn.com

Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 6:48 PM

Subject: RE: Blasphemy Laws ib Bible

If any insults the Jesus(pbuh) and the book reveald on to him, sure put to death. more, if a muslim just thinks about it, next moment he is not a Muslim.
as u said, its a blasphy to say Jesus(pbuh) is a prophet…. then you have to prove that he is not a Prophet.
let me see a single verse of bible which discribes clearly, he said “he is God” or “worship me” ….! simple..! 
As in Islam:

 “There is no god but God, the One and Only, without partner, and Muhammad is only the messenger and servant of God.”
waiting your response……
and see attachmnt, what we Muslims think about Jesus(pbuh) and tunderstand the book Ingeel(The Bible).

From: zoilandon@msn.com
To: Subject: Re: Blasphemy Laws ib Bible
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 13:12:23 -0500

So does this mean you think that Muslims must be put to death for blaspheming against the Bible and saying Jesus is only a prophet?

—– Original Message —–

From:  xxxx

To: zoilandon@msn.com

Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 1:12 PM

Subject: Blasphemy Laws ib Bible

The Third Book of Moses, Called


The Tending of the Lamp
Ex. 27.20, 21
1  And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
2  Command the children of Israel, that they bring unto thee pure oil olive beaten for the light, to cause the lamps to burn continually.
3  Without the veil of the testimony, in the tabernacle of the congregation, shall Aaron order it from the evening unto the morning before the LORD continually: it shall be a statute for ever in your generations.
4  He shall order the lamps upon the pure candlestick before the LORD continually.
The Showbread
5  ¶ And thou shalt take fine flour, and bake twelve cakes thereof: two tenth deals shall be in one cake.
6  And thou shalt set them in two rows, six on a row, upon the pure table before the LORD. Ex. 25.30
7  And thou shalt put pure frankincense upon each row, that it may be on the bread for a memorial, even an offering made by fire unto the LORD.
8  Every sabbath he shall set it in order before the LORD continually, being taken from the children of Israel by an everlasting covenant.
9  And it shall be Aaron’s and his sons’; Mt. 12.4 · Mk. 2.26 · Lk. 6.4 and they shall eat it in the holy place: for it is most holy unto him of the offerings of the LORD made by fire by a perpetual statute.
The Punishment for Blasphemy
10  ¶ And the son of an Israelitish woman, whose father was an Egyptian, went out among the children of Israel: and this son of the Israelitish woman and a man of Israel strove together in the camp;
11  and the Israelitish woman’s son blasphemed the name of the LORD, and cursed. And they brought him unto Moses: (and his mother’s name was Shelo’mith, the daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan:)
12  and they put him in ward, that the mind of the LORD might be showed them.
13  ¶ And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
14  Bring forth him that hath cursed without the camp; and let all that heard him lay their hands upon his head, and let all the congregation stone him.
15  And thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel, saying, Whosoever curseth his God shall bear his sin.
16  And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the LORD, shall be put to death.
17  And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death. Ex. 21.12
18  And he that killeth a beast shall make it good; beast for beast.
19  And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbor; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him;
20  breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: Ex. 21.23-25 · Deut. 19.21 · Mt. 5.38 as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again.
21  And he that killeth a beast, he shall restore it: and he that killeth a man, he shall be put to death.
22  Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country: Num. 15.16 for I am the LORD your God.
23  And Moses spake to the children of Israel, that they should bring forth him that had cursed out of the camp, and stone him with stones: and the children of Israel did as the LORD commanded Moses.


The Third Book of Moses, Called


its enough for you…i think….plz read…!

The Punishment for Blasphemy in Bible 
Leviticus: 24
[10] And the son of an Israelitish woman, whose father was an Egyptian, went out among the children of Israel: and this son of the Israelitish woman and a man of Israel strove together in the camp;
[11] And the Israelitish woman’s son blasphemed the name of the LORD, and cursed. And they brought him unto Moses: (and his mother’s name was Shelomith, the daughter of Dibri, of the tribe of Dan:)
[12] And they put him in ward, that the mind of the LORD might be shewed them.
[13] And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
[14] Bring forth him that hath cursed without the camp; and let all that heard him lay their hands upon his head, and let all the congregation stone him.
[15] And thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel, saying, Whosoever curseth his God shall bear his sin.
[16] And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the LORD, shall be put to death.
[17] And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death.
[18] And he that killeth a beast shall make it good; beast for beast.
[19] And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him;
[20] Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again.
[21] And he that killeth a beast, he shall restore it: and he that killeth a man, he shall be put to death.
[22] Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country: for I am the LORD your God.
[23] And Moses spake to the children of Israel, that they should bring forth him that had cursed out of the camp, and stone him with stones. And the children of Israel did as the LORD commanded Moses.

(Zechariah 13:3)
And if anyone again prophesies, his father and mother who bore him will say to him,(A) ‘You shall not live, for you speak lies in the name of the LORD.’ And his father and mother who bore him shall pierce him through when he prophesies.
(Luke 12:10 RSV)
“And every one who speaks a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.”
Mark 3:28-29
“I tell you the truth, all the sins and blasphemies of men will be forgiven them. But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; he is guilty of an eternal sin.”
HEB 10:29 
How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?
Punishment for Drunkard:
DEU 21:20  They shall say to the elders, “This son of ours is stubborn and
rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a profligate and a drunkard.”

21  Then all the men of his town shall stone him to death. You must purge
the evil from among you. All Israel will hear of it and be afraid.
21  and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did
before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Punishment for HOMOSEXUALITY

LEV 18:22  “‘Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is

29  “‘Everyone who does any of these detestable things–such persons must
be cut off from their people.

20:13  “‘If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them
have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will
be on their own heads.
GEN 3:16  To the woman he said, “I will greatly increase your pains in
childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will
be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”

Tough Christian apologetics with Muslims

A Muslim reader, whom we shall call Mahmoud, emailed me shortly after the Florida pastor burned a Koran. He was hoping he could persuade me to be a mouthpiece for an Islamic campaign to ban offenses against Muslims (such as already exist in Europe).


Thank you for your continued exchange of ideas. I appreciate it.

I hope you are not taking anything I say personally. It is not meant that way.

With all due respect for you:

1-We Westerners do not worship Mohammed and we do not think he is holy. In my case, this is because I see an irreconcilable conflict between the original ancient truth of the Bible and the more recent words of Mohammed that distort the Bible. (For me, the Koran is an insult because it denies the truths of God and the Bible).

2-We believe in free choice and that everyone must decide if he wants to worship and honor God or not. America is wise enough not to punish those who do not honor God, because we know that if we punish them, that will make them reject Him even more.

3-We see too many of those who worship Mohammed as intolerant, violent, ignorant and lazy. There are some exceptions, of course, and I think you are such an exception. I personally do not agree with the idiot (yes, he was an idiot) who burned the Koran — NOT because I think the Koran is holy but because I think the government may now try to use this incident as an excuse to curtail our freedom of speech.

I cannot excuse the killing of those 50 innocent people in Iraq. Can you?

In my view, here is perhaps the main philosophical difference between Muslims and Westerners (Christian or otherwise):

We Westerners believe in individual rights and viewpoints. We believe that people must have the right to develop their own ideas based on independent study, NOT on what the government or a powerful group (religious or secular) tells them (this viewpoint is backed by Jesus, who declares that each individual must choose whether to follow Him or not). Our viewpoint is also essentially based on the scientific method (which parallels Biblical teachings), not so much on a feeling of brotherhood or solidarity with our group – nation, religion, political affiliation, etc.

According to the scientific method, an experiment can be carried out in any part of the world, by peoples of different nationalities and faiths (or lack of faith) and with different political views, and yet (and this is beautiful if you think about it), astonishingly, the results will be essentially the same EVERYWHERE IN THE WORLD.

I believe the scientific method, which was applied on a large scale in Christian Europe for the first time, must be applied not only to science but to all aspects of life. The beauty of this is that a religion that is empty and meaningless, based merely on superstition and coercion will not be able to defend itself in an objective debate. I strongly suspect this is why Islam needs coercion and threats to survive, because it cannot survive in the free market place of ideas.

If this free and objective system of evaluating ideas and religions is applied properly, then ordinary people can come to conclusions about the world around them based not on superstition or religion or political viewpoints, but rather on objective truth.

I firmly believe in objective truth and I reject group think and any attempt to manipulate the truth (Jesus said “you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.” He was willing to die for this principle, which is why I love Him and honor Him above all the prophets. He was MUCH more than a prophet, so to call him a mere prophet, as Mohammed did, is blasphemy).

My viewpoint allows me to disagree with my government. For example, I disagree with Bush and Obama with regard to their invasion of Middle Eastern sovereign territories.

I don’t base my opinions on a religion, a political party’s teachings or a preconceived notion, and I don’t base it on what other Americans or Westerners say or believe. I base it on intense study of numerous viewpoints and facts. Individual and independent study. That is the key to all wisdom and knowledge.

It is very sad to me that millions of people everywhere believe that they must adhere to their viewpoints ONLY because they are Christian, or Muslim, or Protestant, or Catholic, or communist or capitalist, or conservative or whatever.

I am basically a conservative in politics and a classic liberal in economics, but not because my parents believed this way or because Americans in general believe this way (most don’t any more. Obama is a socialist and many have fallen for his lies). I have made my own conclusions about life by traveling to many countries, learning the languages, living with the people, reading a lot of books and articles on various subjects from various viewpoints, and discussing with intelligent people — internationally).

I didn’t start from a Christian viewpoint and then defend Christianity based on this background. I did just the opposite. I became an atheist at the age of 16 and later, as I matured,  gradually came to respect the Bible by studying various religions and seeing the great intellectual, moral and spiritual advantages of Christianity and then later, by seeing how Christ could positively transform my own life. I was particularly impressed by the great age of the Bible. Moses’ writings were some of the first writings in the entire world! Mohammed wrote much later and there is no body of writing to back him up. He denies the Bible. Thus he has rejected all intellectual authority and is followed by people who do likewise.

You will no doubt object, however, that Christians are immoral.

That is not true.

The immorality that is infecting — yes, even destroying — the West is due to the fact that Westerners have given up their faith, NOT because they are Christians. Many pretend to be Christians, but they don’t read or understand the Bible, so they can’t really claim Jesus as their Savior. Many of them use the Bible to defend their socialist politics. Many listen to false preachers who do likewise.

But even this lack of faith (apostasy) in the West is evidence that the Bible is true, because Jesus and other biblical authors predicted this apostasy that we see around us. This apostate immorality and lack of Christian principles is the reason behind the shameful Abu-Ghraib incident and behind the bad behavior of soldiers who murder innocent people. We Westerners no longer have the moral authority to wage foreign wars and we suffer great disasters as a result. We will continue to reap disaster unless we have a great spiritual revival and repent.

The Bible also accurately predicted that there would be earthquakes, wars, and great disasters of the kind we see all around the world just before Jesus comes back to claim His bride.

The thing that many atheists, anti-Westerners and Muslims forget is that there are only a few real  Biblical Christians left in the world, and the rest are not obeying God and cannot be called Christians. Atheists, leftists and many Muslims try to blame Christianity, but the real culprit is a LACK of true Christianity.

I believe that God is using Islam to punish us, and this punishment is justified.

But that does not make me believe in Islam. This phenomenon of God punishing people for their disobedience is similar to what happened to the Jews in Babylon. They were punished by a Babylonian King who did not believe in their God, and this king later found out (through Daniel’s ability to correctly interpret his dreams and predict his future) that the God of the Jews was the true and living God. Consequently, this king began to worship the true and living God.

Something similar is happening now all around the world.

Many people in China and even in your part of the world are finding out that Jesus is the Messiah and that He is King, and they are beginning to worship Him because they see Him working in their lives.

And the more they are persecuted, and the more they are harmed, killed, tortured, banished from their homelands, robbed of their possessions, belittled and martyred, the stronger the faith of new believers becomes. Muslims who participate in this persecution of Christians are helping advance and spread Christianity.

This is something unstoppable. The Western atheistic leaders in the US and the EU are trying desperately to stop Christianity from surviving and growing. This is why they import a million new Muslims into Europe every year. They are workers of iniquity and Satan has them in his power.

But it won’t work. God can break the power of Satan and eventually will do so.

Islam spreads by the sword. Christianity by the Word. And the Word is far superior to the sword because it speaks to our hearts and minds, not to our fears as Islam does.

Muslims at least believe in God, and when they read the Bible and begin to understand the truth, many will turn to Christ. Many already are turning to Him, but they are afraid to admit it to their friends and families, so they say nothing. Perhaps you know some of them.

It is always a pleasure to hear from you and to exchange views with you, despite our differences.

Thank you for the opportunity. May God give you wisdom.


Just as I was about to post this, I received from Mahmoud a long compilation of Bible verses including one demanding that those who blaspheme God should be put to death.

I responded:

“So you think Muslims should be put to death for saying that Jesus was only a prophet instead of the Savior?”

I solicit your prayers for this lost deluded man. Pray that he will see the truth and come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ.

Just as I predicted (and before the day was out): Mahmoud’s arguments against free speech have been picked up in our own Senate. Arch-RINO Lindsay Graham wants to join the Dems in silencing us. Here is a great patriotic speech (patriotic lady calls Lindsay Graham a jackjass! AMEN!)


Just in from another web site (Muslims are not the only ones distorting the scriptures. Our own pastors are hard at it):