Laigle’s Forum

Sent tonight (02/04) to JCS Chief Adm. Mullen,

Sir,

As a former commissioned officer and a top graduate of the Infantry Officer Basic Course at Fort Benning, Georgia, followed by years of service as a Republican Party county chairman and a state public health study commissioner, I offer the following observations.

You and any others –including Mr. Gates and General Powell–who would dare open up the United States Armed Services to the unfettered admission of homosexuals should all be court martialed and sent to Leavenworth. President Obama knows virtually nothing at all of military life or affairs and is simply on a rampage to push through an agenda to placate the homos who so avidly supported him and most of his fellow Democrats in his election campaign.

DADT is bad enough, but has been something we have at least learnt to deal with. To repeal it now is utter insanity! If you want to know “why they hate us” so much in Muslim countries, why don’t you fellas get yourselves a little education as to how the average Muslim thinks about a nation which has opened its political processes up to sodomites and that constantly is pushing a reprobate and utterly abominable culture in its face almost daily through its ubiquitous media!

It is NOT just the Christian “Religious Right” that is upset over this my dear Sirs!

These folks who are addictively fixated and obsessed with anal and oral sex and all manner of other fetishistic and unnatural practices have NO PLACE amongst our sons and daughters who are truly dedicated to the service of our country! They are–to put it mildly–mentally deranged and are too unstable to work amongst the normal heterosexual populace in matters military. My son just returned from a year of infantry duty in Iraq and is equally distraught that his chain of command could be considering such truly bizarre actions!

Homosexuals are still the major vector sub-population for the AIDS virus. Why would we condone such activity and why would we flood our military hospitals with an inevitable influx of a high-proportion of diseased and unfit personnel who would be nothing more than a financial drain upon us all.

The nation’s Armed Forces are to be a premier fighting force as well as a corps of ambassadors of good will and worthy moral standards to set before the nations of the world. With a policy like this we will become even more a laughing stock and a disrespected — and an ineffectual — band of rag-tag, “politically correct” mercenaries, like most of the other sorry tin-horn dictatorships and the “Frenchy and Europhied” little armies who have already acquiesced in such nonsense.

Why we should turn our backs on hundreds of years of solid moral tradition in these matters is beyond me.

Furthermore, if you want to see what the final outcome can likely become to the nation that tolerates such a perverse presence in high political and –now especially — military positions of leadership, I’d ask you to read the book The Pink Swastika. And NO it has NOT been debunked, as some here will now no doubt stridently claim, in its fundamental historical depiction of the Nazi regime and how selfish and obsessive HOMOSEXUAL CADRES enforced some of the most heinous and foul deeds (on even their own countrymen) that the world has ever seen.

Do your study, Sirs! It is quite obvious to us that you have all connived on this beforehand and that the only “study” you intend to really do is HOW TO IMPLEMENT WHAT YOUR BOSSES HAVE TOLD YOU TO DO a fortiori.

Well, as for the rest of us normal servicemen and veterans out here — we are upset, and we will not just sit idly by through it all.

Don,

Some of my observations may be somewhat off-topic, but please, bear with me.

I do have Firefox going but cannot access the DoD article via the link you provided for the DoD website. When I try, I get:

“Oops.. 404 Error
We moved a bunch of stuff. The following resources may help you find what you are looking for ..”

Do you know whether it is the DoD article on homosexuals deserving victim status or just your comment that has been removed or obscured at their website?

You had commented to the DoD about the preferential promotion of openly homosexual personnel. I am curious whether comparable preferential promotions are also being employed for female personnel.

Many authorities in Canada observed over the years that women in the Canadian Armed Forces rise three times faster through the ranks than men do.

Curiously, it appears that identically preferential policies for promotions of women apply in the Canadian judiciary.

I have no knowledge of whether the preferential promotions of women apply only to homosexual women and not to hetero-women, although some open discrimination by lesbian coaches against hetero-women has taken place in Canadian sports and has been reported in the media.

It appears that the problems with promotional policies in the Canadian Armed Forces are not so much employed in favour of openly homosexual men but, more generally, are directed *against* hetero men who are thus being gradually demoted to the status of second-class citizens.