Both parties plant jihadists in US armed forces

Both parties plant jihadists in US armed forces

By Don Hank

Have we progressed to the point that we can see through the phony left-right divide in American politics? I hope so.

I don’t mean that there is no such thing as a left-right difference. There is. Professor Olavo De Carvalho, defined the twisted mentality of the Left, which he calls the “revolutionary mind,” in a lecture (as yet unpublished) that he gave as part of a philosophy course.

But in America, while the Left is still very much the same left that gave itself that name in the French Revolution, the “right” is a malleable jellyfish-like creature that has allowed itself to be redefined, not by its own adherents, but by the wily Left.

Thus, it is a shapeshifting part man part monster, that no one can know because once its malevolent identity is known it immediately transforms itself into something benevolent, and likewise, once it has gained your trust as the benevolent entity you could have sworn you saw in it, it changes back into a serpent and tries to bite you.

I am not saying not to trust the right. Just don’t quite trust anything that calls itself by that name and is making money off of saying conservative things. The reason for this is simple: There is more money to be made in fooling naive conservatives than in being an authentic conservative. The Left controls the purse strings today.

George Bush Sr. and G.W. Bush are the quintessence of the kind of shapeshifter described above. One sprang from the Reagan administration and was trusted for a while until his true identity became known as a New World Order proponent. Dubbya was more subtle, and many trusted him because, unlike his father, he spoke of being a born again Christian.

Yet, many of us now see in him the globalist, and, yes, leftist, that he really is, and was all along. For me, the scales fell from my eyes when I heard him proclaim, speaking of the illegal aliens, “they’re good people looking for a better life,” and speaking of the amnesty he promoted, “it’s good for our soul.” He was pretending to be our shaman, our link to God, not our mortal leader, and he despised us, thinking we were more stupid than we were.

And the perfidy he had been perpetrating behind the scenes is still coming to light.

Referring to the Muslim mass murderer who shot down his comrades at Fort Hood, radio host David Levine writes:

How did we allow this to happen? Muslim terrorist sleepers in our Armed Forces…Rumsfeld and Bush are the reasons why illegal alien gang bangers are in our Army. But Muslim American citizens? Rumsfeld was desperate for soldiers in 2004 while trying to run a “p.c. war” (without using blanket bombing planes to do the job), an insane war that was killing our soldiers and Marines in record numbers. Conscription was low because, wisely, Americans didn’t want to get blown up by an IED in or around Baghdad as the Pentagon had failed to foresee the need for heavily armed vehicles and body armor, which were expensive. And we couldn’t construct vehicles to withstand the powerful IEDs. Instead of having the cojones to institute the draft (which of course would have, I believe, ended the Iraq War years ago because of the mass protests that would have occurred) or settle on blanket bombing so that our Army and Marines wouldn’t be used as fodder in door to door gun battles with terrorists, Rumsfeld got the approval from an EO signed by Bush in 2004 to recruit and enlist illegal alien gang members by the thousands, offering them citizenship if they served faithfully. Muslim Americans were already in the Army from the Papa Bush and Clinton years. I believe that their numbers in the U.S. Army increased significantly during the Iraq War. Could we have stopped Muslim Americans from enlisting and could the Pentagon have weeded out the thousands of U.S. Muslims already in the Army? Of course! There are ways of vetting people that are near-foolproof, but it’s costly and it takes time and Rumsfeld didn’t want to take the time because though we had won the war, we were losing the Occupation of Iraq. And of course, Bush didn’t want to be seen as “anti-Muslim”, nor did the Army want to be seen in the same way.”

And indeed, as it now turns out, advisors to the Obama transition team, named during the Bush administration by Homeland Security officials chosen by Bush, had chosen, in 2008, Major Hasan, the Muslim mass murderer of Fort Hood, as an advisor to the Obama transition team:

http://www.examiner.com/x-27803-Trumbull-County-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m11d6-Killer-Hasan-was-Homeland-Security-advisor-on-Obama-transition-team

Here is Hasan listed on p. 29 of the report “Thinking Anew — Security Priorities for the Next Administration,” April 2008 — Jan 2009, by the George Washington University’s Security Policy Institute:

http://www.gwumc.edu/hspi/old/PTTF_ProceedingsReport_05.19.09.pdf

Friends, do you now understand that there is virtually no left-right divide in American politics any more? And this is not because left and right have merged, as some erroneously contend. It is because the Left has completely absorbed the so-called “right.” There is virtually no authentic right wing any longer in American politics. Many of the phonies, like New Gingrich, are easy to spot. They give themselves away – as did Newt by supporting ultraleft candidate Dede Scozafava, or Mitt Romney, who as governor supported same-sex marriage and socialized medicine, along with the infamous “$50 abortion” in Massachusetts, after he claimed to have had his conservative epiphany.

Others are more subtle, like the vast majority of “conservatives,” who sound rock-ribbed on the economy and even pay lip service to “life,” but carefully dance around sovereignty issues like border security and amnesty for illegal aliens.

There are less than a handful of options for you to bypass the corrupt and treacherous “Republicrats.” One of the only veteran politicians to have avoided falling into line with the cabal of globalists, rich bankers, and leftist politicians that yearn to run our world is Ron Paul. A third party option is also still out there, such as the AIP and Constitutional Party. Of course, none of these has a line-up of seasoned political veterans. On the other hand, Obama is not a seasoned veteran either, but he is succeeding well enough – frighteningly well –  in ramming home his leftist agenda. So theoretically, at least, a rooky politician with a good grounding in Constitutional principles – say, someone like our first president – could possibly pull us out of the tailspin we are in. Especially since the vast majority of seasoned politicians have sold us out with their yea vote for the bailouts and stimulus packages almost none of us wanted.

If a conservative end run around the GOP and Democrat party seems far-fetched, remember: so did our triumph over the British.

But we American didn’t do it alone. We trusted in Providence, our only hope then, our only hope today.

Related:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115218

Afterword:

Some readers came a bit unglued at the contention that both parties “planted” jihadists in the military. Two objections were raised:

1–A military vet objected saying that no one can be recruited in the US military who is not a citizen. I refer that person to the following article from the Wall St Journal:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125755853525335343.html

“Today, recruiting more Muslims is a top priority for many branches of the military. Under the Army’s “09 Lima” program, Muslims willing to enlist and serve in Iraq and Afghanistan as military translators and cultural advisers receive hefty signing bonuses and expedited paths to citizenship.”

Another objection was the notion of actually “planting” jihadists. Planting is not always intentional. I can buy a bad batch of seeds and wind up planting the wrong variety of beans in my garden. I did not mean to imply that this was intentional. Obviously, neither party deliberately planted the jihadists there. They were planted by ill-advised policies and policy makers.

Don


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

6 Responses to “Both parties plant jihadists in US armed forces”

  1. PC, PC, PC, Pc, pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,PC, PC, PC, pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,
    pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,pc,!!!

  2. If I said somethng other than PC, PC, PC, I don’t think it would be PC!

  3. Jeffrey Long Says:

    My default “Christian grace” approach to Newt was utterly and irreparably deflated with his endorsement of Scozzafava.

    I liked him as a detail man and good thinker AND with extending more than a nod to original intent, traditional values, etc., but his insistent rationalizations in support of her were simply too much for me.

    Sarah Palin ranks high in my opinion, but may not be ready yet for the Oval office. But she SHOULD be placed highly in any future administration and given a chance to “unfold.”

    We need someone more perfect, say Dr. Manhattan. No, even he became gradually co-opted by inside-the-beltway thinking–and became a nudist. No family values there for sure!

  4. Don – great article, but we need your mind to engage this beast with much more force and penetration. Spell out what you see as the handful of options. Explore the two mindsets more deeply. Offer more possible solutions. Strategize. Plot.

  5. Don,

    My use of the word “Conscription” in your quote from my piece on jihadists and illegal alien gang members in our Armed forces was incorrect–thanks for pointing that out to me. It should be “Enlistment” as you suggested.

    I saw Newt for what he was when he was Speaker of the House. He got drunk with power (not unusual for a D.C. pol) and shot himself in the foot by 1) allowing the Democrats to make it appear as if HE and his conservative House colleagues were the ones “shutting down the Federal Government” in the 2003-2004 budget fight, 2) that foolish book deal that cost him his seat and 3) his pushing NAFTA through an angry House for Bill Clinton, a treaty which increased illegal entry into the U.S. by Mexicans hurt by the Treaty, a legacy that continues today. Hardly the actions of a real conservative! What I disliked the most about Gingrich though–and still do–was his “smile” as he spouts his gibberish. Pols who smile when they’re knifing in the back the voters who put them in office need to have their smiles wiped off their faces! So it’s no surprise to me that Gingrich backed the liberal Scozzafava over Hoffman. What is interesting about that race is that Hoffman was really a liberal-moderate who himself had backed Scozzafava before suddenly deciding to run! How could a supposed “conservative” back a liberal? And “The Conservative Party” that Hoffman joined has some really weird plank positions. These, in my opinion, exposed Hoffman for what he is, and so he lost.

    bioqubit, by “engaging this beast”, are you talking about a third party conservative movement? That has already occurred. Many Independent conservatives like myself voted for the only true conservative in the pack last year, Dr. Chuck Baldwin. Baldwin is even tougher on illegal immigration than Tancredo and emulates Ron Paul on getting rid of the Fed. He believes that there is little difference anymore between the two major parties. Of course, Baldwin’s party, The Constitution Party, didn’t have the money and boots on the ground apparently to get onto every ballot in every state. Also, they took a beating when a Federal judge awarded Constitution Party loser (for the nomination) Alan Keyes the CP’s ballot position in CA under a new party name, forcing The CP OFF the CA ballot and forcing voters like myself to have to write in Dr. Baldwin for President. As my guest on my radio show some months back, Dr. Baldwin told me that that decision by that Federal judge cost Dr. Baldwin between 40,000 and 60,000 votes, hardly enough to have made a difference in the election however. Don mentioned America’s First Party–that’s Keye’s new party that stole The CP’s position on the CA ballot last November. The $64,000 question I see appearing is…what third party is going to syphon off angry Tea Party votes? Patriot movement voters will likely vote for The CP’s and Libertarian Party’s candidates. That “anger” isn’t reserved for Obama, Pelosi, Reid & Co! It’s also being channeled at RINOs who control the GOP. I see a strong anti-RINO movement afoot. Will Dr. Baldwin run again in 2012? Lou Dobbs shot himself in the foot the other day on a Telemundo interview where he came out for Amnesty except for gang members. If he’s thinking of s White House run, he made that trek even more unlikely by coming out for Amnesty, destroying the faith his core backers had in him.

    Palin has an organization behind her, true and probably money. However, she hasn’t “separated” herself from McCain. She’s not “running rogue”! She’s not “the Outsider” her backers would have us think she is. I think there’s going to be a darkhorse social and law and order Conservative who could steal the GOP nomination, but it will have to be someone new and I’m not referring to Texas Gov. Rick Perry. Too many old “faux conservative”, “fiscal conservative” faces like Romney still considering a run. As I wrote on my blogsite the other day, history doesn’t shine well on losing VP candidates in the previous election. I enumerated what I thought to be some of Palin’s problems on the road to The White House in 2012:

    1) Some voters believe the President should be a man.

    2) She hasn’t separated herself from McCain, one of this country’s worst candidates on record and probably the RINO most hated by conservatives.

    3) Some feel she’s “a cheerleader”, a lightweight–not a leader. We don’t need a cheerleader.

    4) Some will remember her awful performance during the Charlie Gibson interview and the other interview-gone-bad with Katie Couric which indicated she hadn’t thought out the issues and where she stands. Boilerplate answers aren’t going to cut it the next go round!

    5) While she may be pro-gun and pro-Life, she’s also pro-Amnesty which the McCain Campaign successfully covered up until her October 2008 interview on Univision and their pro-Amnesty commercials in Spanish on that and other Spanish-only media. Her statement on Rush’s interview a week ago seemed to be throwing a little red meat to those of us on the anti-Invasion side, but it didn’t wash. Unlike last fall when there were only a few months following the Convention to “get to know her positions on the issues”, there will be plenty of time to bring those positions out before the 2012 election. Her pro-Amnesty position will not endear her to law and order conservatives.

    6) Her TARP suppport.

    7) Her family problems. This is down the list because 3 years from now, voters probably won’t care much as “all families have these kinds of problems”.
    ************************************************************
    This being said about Palin, Romney has his problems, as well, especially his support for both the Bush-Paulsen bailout and Obama’s bailout. Also his Mansiongate embarrassment that sunk him in two debates, plus he could never win the South.

    Huckabee may want to run, but could never win Northern states. Pawlenty may run, but as Governor, he couldn’t give Minnesota to McCain-Palin last November.

  6. [...] Both parties plant jihadists in US armed forces [...]

Leave a Reply