Comments on: CA court illegally struck down same-sex marriage ban http://laiglesforum.com/2008/07/06/ca-court-illegally-struck-down-same-sex-marriage-ban/ Christian Activism Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:02:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: LAIGLESFORUM http://laiglesforum.com/2008/07/06/ca-court-illegally-struck-down-same-sex-marriage-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-16618 LAIGLESFORUM Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:06:47 +0000 http://laiglesforum.com/?p=281#comment-16618 Hey everyone, Check out this site, from the author of the first post above. Looks good to me: http://www.jeremiahfilms.com/released/marriage/balanceofpower.html Don Hank Hey everyone,
Check out this site, from the author of the first post above. Looks good to me:

http://www.jeremiahfilms.com/released/marriage/balanceofpower.html

Don Hank

]]> By: Paul Benedict http://laiglesforum.com/2008/07/06/ca-court-illegally-struck-down-same-sex-marriage-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-16617 Paul Benedict Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:47:46 +0000 http://laiglesforum.com/?p=281#comment-16617 The law seems to be the least of this court's issues; however, one must think that, like the income tax, the details of jurisdiction Jackson complains about have long since become history. Surely, all the jibber-jabber in the court's opinion about civil rights and its continued reference to the Perez case form its threadbare excuses for the complete trampling of the California constitution. The next outrage will be when this court refuses, as it absolutely must, to allow Californians to vote on the ballot imitative that would restore the constitution to its original state (sad though that might be). Then what... Then what? Can California appeal to the U.S. Supremes? That ought to be interesting. Who would bring suit -- the Attorney General of California? Don't count on it. The law seems to be the least of this court’s issues; however, one must think that, like the income tax, the details of jurisdiction Jackson complains about have long since become history. Surely, all the jibber-jabber in the court’s opinion about civil rights and its continued reference to the Perez case form its threadbare excuses for the complete trampling of the California constitution.

The next outrage will be when this court refuses, as it absolutely must, to allow Californians to vote on the ballot imitative that would restore the constitution to its original state (sad though that might be). Then what… Then what? Can California appeal to the U.S. Supremes? That ought to be interesting. Who would bring suit — the Attorney General of California? Don’t count on it.

]]> By: Jeremiah Films Announncements http://laiglesforum.com/2008/07/06/ca-court-illegally-struck-down-same-sex-marriage-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-16616 Jeremiah Films Announncements Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:35:15 +0000 http://laiglesforum.com/?p=281#comment-16616 <strong>Is the same sex marriage California Court ruling a violation of separation of powers?...</strong> The California Constitution, only give the voters authority to amend or repeal the marriage statute limiting marriage to one man and one woman (Prop 22).... Is the same sex marriage California Court ruling a violation of separation of powers?…

The California Constitution, only give the voters authority to amend or repeal the marriage statute limiting marriage to one man and one woman (Prop 22)….

]]>