The subversion of American education
THE HISTORY of Education subversion
Americans who are ignorant about the subversion of the education system over the last nearly 100 years are dooming their children to be ignorant about everything else.
The site linked below has an impressive reading list. I would recommend getting at least one of these books. A friend sent me one by Bev Eakman, an outstandingly insightful researcher whom I highly recommend.
Actually, the history of the United States in the last century is the story of subversion, which touches every important aspect of our lives. But the subversion of education was undoubtedly the most devastating, having led in some places to a near-total breakdown of morality. For while banning all references to traditional religion or intelligent design, for example, the system has openly endorsed other religions and their pillars: secularism, effete Darwinism (an ideology that masquerades as a science and, ironically, has not evolved itself in over 100 years!), globalism, enviro-Marxism (a term on loan from Don Feder), socialism, feminism, anti-white racism, Islam, the gay agenda and many more ideologies that are nothing but cheap substitutes for Judeo-Christianity.
Reading list:
http://www.sntp.net/education/education_list.htm
HERE is an interesting site run by former Muslims.
It seems as if these people just got fed up watching their co-religionists making fools of themselves and hurting themselves and others in the process. In Romans, the Apostle Paul writes that even those who have not had a religious upbringing or an education in the law are capable of distinguishing right from wrong and know in their hearts what sin is. Here is proof of that:
UN RESOLUTION to muzzle freedom of speech, under pressure from Islamic nations.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/27/AR2008032704100.html?hpid=sec-world
The UN has not mentioned the Islam-on-Christian persecution going on throughout the Muslim world, or the abuse of women and children there, but they want to make sure Muslims don’t get defamed by the group they persecute.
To this end, they have written a resolution. Now you realize, of course, that millions of people in Muslim countries think of Jews as pigs and apes and Iran president Ahmadinejad denies the historicity of the Holocaust. Where is the UN resolution on that outrage?
Well, outrage is selective at the UN it turns out.
The EU countries, who are still concerned about this quaint concept of freedom, did not approve the resolution, proving that there is still some fight left there, despite the abject cowardice exhibited by the governments of individual countries like Holland.
Maybe the Wilders movie has had an effect.
Personally, I think it probably did. I went into a Dutch forum and read various messages on this film. The usually dhimmis were represented, claiming that Wilders is a race baiter. But many expressed approval.
Most telling of all was a poll that asked whether readers thought Wilders was over the top or had in fact made his point. 65% said he had made his point.
That surprised me, because the online daily newspaper Volkskrant, to which I subscribe, has written almost all negative articles and commentary about Wilders and his film since the news first broke that he was developing it, creating the impression that the Dutch don’t like Wilders and think he is a rabble rouser.
It may be too early for optimism, but the signs look favorable for a change in Holland soon.
Clearly the posters in that forum were fed up with being told how to think by Muslim newcomers who refuse to adapt. One poster made the point that when a Dutch person travels or settles in another country, he/she adapts and accepts the customs there, whereas the Muslims settle in a new country and right away want to tell the residents there how to think and act.
I think they’re finally getting it.
God bless you all this weekend!
Donald Hank
UN OKs Islamic Text Against Defamation
By ELIANE ENGELER
The Associated Press
Thursday, March 27, 2008; 11:40 PM
GENEVA — The top U.N. rights body on Thursday passed a resolution proposed by Islamic countries saying it is deeply concerned about the defamation of religions and urging governments to prohibit it.
The European Union said the text was one-sided because it primarily focused on Islam.
The U.N. Human Rights Council, which is dominated by Arab and other Muslim countries, adopted the resolution on a 21-10 vote over the opposition of Europe and Canada.
EU countries, including France, Germany and Britain, voted against. Previously EU diplomats had said they wanted to stop the growing worldwide trend of using religious anti-defamation laws to limit free speech.
The document, which was put forward by the Organization of the Islamic Conference, “expresses deep concern at attempts to identify Islam with terrorism, violence and human rights violations.”
Although the text refers frequently to protecting all religions, the only religion specified as being attacked is Islam, to which eight paragraphs refer.
Speaking for the EU, Slovenian Ambassador Andrej Logar said the 27-nation body was committed to tolerance, nondiscrimination and freedom of religion. But instead of a one-sided approach, it would be better to engage in dialogue with mutual respect.
The resolution “urges states to take actions to prohibit the dissemination … of racist and xenophobic ideas” and material that would incite to religious hatred. It also urges states to adopt laws that would protect against hatred and discrimination stemming from religious defamation.
The pressure to protect religions from defamation has been growing ever since a Danish magazine published caricatures of Muhammad, provoking riots across the Islamic world in 2006 in which dozens of people were killed. The publication of a different caricature in a Swedish newspaper last year again led to protests from Muslims.
Finally here is an eye-opener on illegal immigration:
http://www.americanshavehadenough.org/immigration.htm
Especially surprising is the list of things states are doing to stop illegal immigration, including many northern states that will be sending national guard troops to the Mexican border.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply